From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Michael Heerdegen Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.help Subject: Re: Gnus: Thread notes? Date: Tue, 28 Nov 2017 08:44:11 +0100 Message-ID: <87bmjmq244.fsf@web.de> References: <87o9pc359b.fsf@web.de> <874lr3pz2q.fsf@ericabrahamsen.net> <87o9p6zy4f.fsf@web.de> <878tgavoio.fsf@ericabrahamsen.net> <87fu93ulhz.fsf@web.de> <87o9nq50hi.fsf@ericabrahamsen.net> <877eudsj2x.fsf@web.de> <874lpfjgb2.fsf@ericabrahamsen.net> NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1511855113 5694 195.159.176.226 (28 Nov 2017 07:45:13 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 28 Nov 2017 07:45:13 +0000 (UTC) User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.0.50 (gnu/linux) Cc: help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org To: Eric Abrahamsen Original-X-From: help-gnu-emacs-bounces+geh-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Nov 28 08:45:09 2017 Return-path: Envelope-to: geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1eJaZm-0000yS-VZ for geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Tue, 28 Nov 2017 08:45:07 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:36389 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1eJaZu-0001Gf-D1 for geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Tue, 28 Nov 2017 02:45:14 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:57753) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1eJaZT-0001GN-9C for help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 28 Nov 2017 02:44:48 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1eJaZQ-0005gO-6q for help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 28 Nov 2017 02:44:47 -0500 Original-Received: from mout.web.de ([212.227.15.14]:56213) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1eJaZP-0005fv-Sj for help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 28 Nov 2017 02:44:44 -0500 Original-Received: from drachen.dragon ([88.66.201.17]) by smtp.web.de (mrweb003 [213.165.67.108]) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 0LqDTc-1eoVTV061w-00dk8Q; Tue, 28 Nov 2017 08:44:33 +0100 X-Provags-ID: V03:K0:NtIPMUAvFVIVkfaDZiSgCehlRvK1zig2NSazCij+xw77xhYnyE7 GatemhT8aZDhrjYDcj8H44Kd/PyQwEjE873VDTVZvF8jUYWryfJH7c9NUeRytLk4KTu4w4f Qsg4tjdafvAgfaM1eXshdGXGIywLBo3JA0hevkuNHTpZHdPbIIgiXmAeZc4x1CAOZ5qWKWU Qekjv9NUyiW5yKiKnE85g== X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1;V01:K0:U22RtHPTOv8=:hPpZZjTs0BoASXtbLCr3Cg iTr7sE+YsN7p7ZzM7Pxt/EfgSI5jJQwLXo7X8Xmscl8FZnt+fM1hZiBityedQXfuINufv5gN3 DVhpx0tOd0IKe7m7mwzWzmBiKNiovviSkxH3d9Z4foIqTcRaLgXaF/t4z7p6S0fLgl7KkV9uA oA6IHPgePxPHLujY/PNS5kaFVv2NBoG4vKwTO2SHd1/6qaieEU7YD+mFbfVs7qnlWdpnMdDKW a6fsknDHrOqQ/Vl4dPiDHlwjefPS6nE0hPlOgZpdjynqkvK9RYL1AiqsAq5dlEdUdAi7exjo4 z2I+hMt4Xbn4R/Z/ilsjerwEmQKYL/GLwVnWA2ocss9LucaQZsFgGDVgiNubp9Fed9MzLzEwq y165KSWupzygAS/piEPHa9V9Y3B5ro40pLmz7shjrgYJVXzT6sW0CTaWiceH+OLPOYm51qNKJ eSvXiYO37qoM4aY6zYD5jLxcQgzLlM+dcqVbXX1hqlwjT/TTsq03DxWFYHEm/sM4pKfeuMKYL S6YZ6XNWlOGYUYDWsAlkEMM72xpwprKN/W4eixchBdugoyX+W/N146URpY8uv3cT0KgD0XZ8J RhvZZ+bKEL8fJch9nhjaUKtTomaAv5i/jWJ6YY54pJjM6qSZPrCDshFYOK/4JX4nd+/sP1d/z HqkGEkqPNofs6xB1tih6HYWWyyQlKHBzjJFgZZIN0Dcm77VrPTbDGvFbUnNJfl4AbO4cLWIyX Uy6M72NTrX4wW0bHSad4A4Vq+iBcsW3ibiwTZ7VTFr3kgYLGOqxPK9F7N/s4s1NLuWDOijdB X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] [fuzzy] X-Received-From: 212.227.15.14 X-BeenThere: help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: Users list for the GNU Emacs text editor List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: help-gnu-emacs-bounces+geh-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "help-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.help:115124 Archived-At: Eric Abrahamsen writes: > > FWIW, I would even find it acceptable if Gnorb would just silently > > tick the relevant messages. It's easy enough to untick them again, > > and maybe the need to do that explicitly would integrate well with > > people's work flow. The idea is that messages you have operated on > > with Gnorb are all important. > > I'd be annoyed by that behavior, but I can provide a customization > option that will do it. I still like the idea of the Gnorb-specific > limit function, though. If you would get it all work conveniently without the need of background ticking, it would be better and nicer, yes. > This has been a multi-year headache. Right now I'm checking the value of > `gnus-server-method-cache', and I don't know why your server isn't added > to that. I'll add an explicit check for `gnus-secondary-select-methods', > too. I don't know, since I don't know the purpose of this cache. If I replace that test so that it returns "my-gnorb-server" (hardcoded), C-c v works, so it's indeed the wrong test. I guess you could instead check `gnus-server-alist'? Regards, Michael.