From: pjb@informatimago.com (Pascal J. Bourguignon)
To: help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org
Subject: Re: Fixing antediluvianisms in Emacs' UI
Date: Sat, 10 Jul 2010 16:22:52 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87aapze7r7.fsf@kuiper.lan.informatimago.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: slrni3f4gr.avn.nospam-abuse@powdermilk.math.berkeley.edu
Ilya Zakharevich <nospam-abuse@ilyaz.org> writes:
> On 2010-07-08, David Kastrup <dak@gnu.org> wrote:
>> I think the point was that the manual was not deficient concerning the
>> information it provides, but in not making Xah Lee want to read it.
>
>> In a way, it is a losing battle.
>
> Why consider it in military terms? The question at point is that
> Emacs' UI is lacking. So just fix it: make it self-documenting, as
> any good-UI program should be...
>
> Looks like some vestiges of 80s' mentality still remains in Emacs
> design: at the time, a common misconception was that problems with UI
> may be "fixed" by updating the manuals. Well, even if one still
> believes in this way, it is a dead end: Emacs' manual IS quite good
> already, so the improvements achieved in this way would have a trace
> value only.
>
> Now, after the flood of "grandmother revolution" [*], we know OTHER
> ways. "Self-documenting" means the program guides the user how to use
> it. Emacs is now flexible enough so that with most tasks, this may be
> easily achieved.
>
> [*] this is how as one of the designers of Plan9 called the major
> event of 90s: achievement of understanding of UI design so good
> that UI accessible to "grandmothers" may be created. He
> attributes this breakthrough to effort of M$; I tend to agree...
I'm not so sure grandmothers can use Microsoft programs so easily.
I sure cannot.
It seems to me that parangons of software explorability are more in
the camp of emacs, lisp and smalltalk. Granted, this is archived so
far mostly by giving access to the sources, so not for grandmothers.
But then, Smalltalk was designed for grandchildren...
>> People expect software to just work without reading manuals.
>
> That's right. And when we can EASILY cater to their expectations, we should.
>
> The question at point: ISearch. Lemme sketch one possiblity of adding
> self-documentation to ISearch (people with better UI-design experience
> must be able to find something yet better):
>
> a) Change the prompt (configurable; verbose by default;
> self-documentation should mention how to disable verbosity):
>
> Isearch (F1 for help):
>
> b) bind F1 F1 to "Open manual on basics of Isearch";
>
> c) bind F1 to open a shrink-wrapped buffer with "Quick info" on
> ISearch. This info should include the `current state' (case
> sensitivity etc) - plus information where this state "comes
> from": e.g., whether the particular setting is mode-specific. It
> should also state how to toggle "I" in ISearch, toggle case-fold,
> switch direction, regexpness, by-word, different ways to quit,
> etc.
>
> Should also state how to start Isearch in `a particular state'
> (with some toggles pre-loaded).
>
> Does not look difficult to do, does it?
It's a lot of work if you have to do it manually for all the commands.
You must find a way to do it automatically. We may require adding
declarations to commands, perhaps an improved interactive declaration?
--
__Pascal Bourguignon__ http://www.informatimago.com/
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-07-10 14:22 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-07-07 6:43 Rapidly navigating buffers using search Jonathan Groll
2010-07-07 6:52 ` Aidan Gauland
2010-07-07 6:54 ` Thierry Volpiatto
2010-07-07 7:40 ` Qiang Guo
2010-07-07 8:01 ` Jonathan Groll
2010-07-07 8:45 ` Andrea Crotti
2010-07-07 9:33 ` Deniz Dogan
2010-07-07 10:25 ` Jonathan Groll
[not found] ` <mailman.11.1278498387.2272.help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org>
[not found] ` <9dc07ed9-f6f1-4ac5-949a-5b97368cc32a@n19g2000prf.googlegroups.com>
2010-07-08 2:28 ` despen
[not found] ` <87mxu22rbc.fsf@lola.goethe.zz>
2010-07-08 17:59 ` bolega
2010-07-08 22:11 ` WYSIWYG and usability (was: " Peter Flynn
2010-07-08 20:42 ` despen
2010-07-09 21:18 ` Fixing antediluvianisms in Emacs' UI Ilya Zakharevich
2010-07-10 14:22 ` Pascal J. Bourguignon [this message]
2010-07-09 21:39 ` Rapidly navigating buffers using search Ilya Zakharevich
2010-07-10 18:13 ` Xah Lee
2010-07-10 23:25 ` B. T. Raven
2010-07-11 4:47 ` Xah Lee
2010-07-11 13:31 ` B. T. Raven
2010-07-11 16:13 ` David Kastrup
2010-07-11 21:58 ` B. T. Raven
[not found] ` <873cd6b9-8a85-478f-9943-c3ce09eb62c6@n8g2000prh.googlegroups.com>
2010-07-11 21:50 ` B. T. Raven
2010-07-10 21:01 ` Uday S Reddy
2010-07-07 10:54 ` Aidan Gauland
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
List information: https://www.gnu.org/software/emacs/
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87aapze7r7.fsf@kuiper.lan.informatimago.com \
--to=pjb@informatimago.com \
--cc=help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).