From: Pascal Bourguignon <spam@mouse-potato.com>
Subject: Re: New balance-windows
Date: Sun, 07 Aug 2005 22:42:31 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <878xzdtr60.fsf@thalassa.informatimago.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: mailman.2899.1123441421.20277.help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org
Lennart Borgman <lennart.borgman.073@student.lu.se> writes:
> Pascal Bourguignon wrote:
>
>>>>File: elisp, Node: Window Internals
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>Thanks, I did not know this was available. Then the windows in each
>>>frame can be seen as a tree using those fields you mentioned. But what
>>>should then be done with this? What should the mapping between this
>>>tree and the visual view be? It looks to me that the level in the tree
>>>alone will not give any useful hint. The topology (ie whether the
>>>splitting was horizontal or vertical) must be taken into account, but
>>>maybe the level in the tree can be used too? It actually looks a bit
>>>difficult...
>>>
>>>
>>
>>Well, it's only available to the C programmer...
>>
>>
> I noticed when I tried to implement the algorithm I suggested. However
> it should be possible to find the split tree with a bit of work. It
> may fail when window borders meat each like a + so to say, but maybe
> trying to change the window sizes can resolve such cases. So I was
> wrong I think. It is not absolutely necessary to have the access to
> those hchild etc.
>
> I guess you are counting the children in each sub tree (something
> similar to what I suggested though you may not have read that)? Maybe
> it should be good with some weights for a user to customize?
>
> Finding the split tree is a bit tricky to say the least. You have to
> imagine a split tree and start to pick up the windows from the leafs
> and work upwards. Maybe thinking in sets helps? There are certain
> cases where you can not know how the split tree actually was (like
> three windows above each other), but from a user perspective those are
> perhaps better handled as a node with three childs whether that is the
> case in the internal split tree or not. (Perhaps this shows that it is
> better not to use the internal split tree?)
Indeed, the + case can be distinguished enlarging one window,
|
getting either __|-- or -+-+-, or still +, and checking for
|
changes in the other windows.
So it's possible to recover the split tree from the window list.
--
"You cannot really appreciate Dilbert unless you read it in the
original Klingon"
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-08-07 20:42 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-08-03 0:47 Making the width of three windows equal Samuel
2005-08-03 1:01 ` Pascal Bourguignon
2005-08-03 2:13 ` Samuel
2005-08-03 3:11 ` Pascal Bourguignon
2005-08-06 11:59 ` New balance-windows (Was Re: Making the width of three windows equal) Ehud Karni
2005-08-06 13:27 ` New balance-windows Ehud Karni
[not found] ` <mailman.2758.1123335041.20277.help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org>
2005-08-06 16:42 ` Pascal Bourguignon
2005-08-07 17:15 ` New balance-windows (Was Re: Making the width of three windows equal) Richard M. Stallman
2005-08-08 9:27 ` Ehud Karni
2005-08-09 0:27 ` Richard M. Stallman
2005-08-10 0:05 ` New balance-windows Stefan Monnier
2005-08-10 1:48 ` Stefan Monnier
[not found] ` <mailman.3158.1123633927.20277.help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org>
2005-08-21 0:33 ` David Combs
[not found] ` <mailman.2979.1123493766.20277.help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org>
2005-08-08 17:55 ` Pascal Bourguignon
[not found] ` <mailman.2888.1123436059.20277.help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org>
2005-08-07 18:31 ` Pascal Bourguignon
[not found] ` <mailman.2754.1123329756.20277.help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org>
2005-08-06 16:39 ` Pascal Bourguignon
2005-08-06 16:58 ` Lennart Borgman
[not found] ` <mailman.2773.1123347813.20277.help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org>
2005-08-06 20:45 ` Pascal Bourguignon
2005-08-06 21:14 ` Lennart Borgman
[not found] ` <mailman.2796.1123363907.20277.help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org>
2005-08-07 18:23 ` Pascal Bourguignon
2005-08-07 18:59 ` Lennart Borgman
[not found] ` <mailman.2899.1123441421.20277.help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org>
2005-08-07 20:42 ` Pascal Bourguignon [this message]
2005-08-06 21:05 ` Ehud Karni
2005-08-07 2:17 ` Lennart Borgman
2005-08-08 9:36 ` Ehud Karni
2005-08-08 9:47 ` Lennart Borgman
[not found] ` <mailman.2988.1123495783.20277.help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org>
2005-08-08 10:18 ` David Kastrup
2005-08-08 11:18 ` Ehud Karni
2005-08-08 12:05 ` Lennart Borgman
[not found] ` <mailman.3002.1123500982.20277.help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org>
2005-08-08 18:11 ` Pascal Bourguignon
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
List information: https://www.gnu.org/software/emacs/
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=878xzdtr60.fsf@thalassa.informatimago.com \
--to=spam@mouse-potato.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).