From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Christoph Groth Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.help Subject: Re: Emacs opens only first 16384 bytes of file?! Date: Mon, 13 Feb 2023 08:59:01 +0100 Message-ID: <878rh2t2re.fsf@drac> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="30921"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.1 (gnu/linux) Cc: help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org To: eliz@gnu.org Original-X-From: help-gnu-emacs-bounces+geh-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Mon Feb 13 09:00:09 2023 Return-path: Envelope-to: geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1pRTkq-0007s0-D2 for geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Mon, 13 Feb 2023 09:00:09 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1pRTkJ-0000QO-Ur; Mon, 13 Feb 2023 02:59:31 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1pRTkH-0000Pz-O1 for help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 13 Feb 2023 02:59:30 -0500 Original-Received: from dia.uberspace.de ([185.26.156.221]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1pRTk6-0007l0-Rm for help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 13 Feb 2023 02:59:21 -0500 Original-Received: (qmail 32090 invoked by uid 989); 13 Feb 2023 07:59:03 -0000 Authentication-Results: dia.uberspace.de; auth=pass (plain) In-Reply-To: 83357bhzte.fsf@gnu.org X-Rspamd-Bar: - X-Rspamd-Report: BAYES_HAM(-1.846357) MIME_GOOD(-0.1) MID_RHS_NOT_FQDN(0.5) X-Rspamd-Score: -1.446357 Original-Received: from unknown (HELO unkown) (::1) by dia.uberspace.de (Haraka/3.0.1) with ESMTPSA; Mon, 13 Feb 2023 08:59:03 +0100 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=grothesque.org; s=uberspace; h=from; bh=nmwdRef82Ej1VsLH2ZPEt/rcqFBBw57dRqNr376iOFs=; b=WkH1grm1a+SgiJleZJyo2CBkJFAvChXloImv3d69tJkp6wWHR+FoYHYAL9QVPfP9DQKvkYxLzl 0TcRFdg1T7ItLdk7HKspQ50VhBVE5p4YJTtcBlb/D4/itxEOl91+97Gqu0FVMBDlfzhlUyBztA56 +Oel+dZW9dHT6Pm6K/JQOZbcsREONluWvkCmqB7mUFn/CEEp1dhpE4FfG02isBhoLEDwXwcVTKws ahjI7evtikRXLmI89o69USG63SH6jMngA9fxxhiRtLMKYYeTJo24ZXGL6RSjKeAq3IuQOsMzuvME b72dEEh05UZvbnxe62t2KbWKZNtSIMs0BOi8pe8OYg9xm0Ff9W3Q5o+51rC9/SIpiIvGWuHXqXyU pKDnsNk9+yLpkOm9hm3jQDo9jL6FwL1ShPatKVGZGTE3L7qVKpVCCCHTVx3Qccp99xRss0clEQJm 0HNc5o2oYyknl35fYgc8Bl29g2zS2Oct3rDcrhRDynRSZsl9ChZ3PSyNJPnjv/eoO7aoKrVCcGW1 jRJM7/wsgqFsHhg15sSlOJQZxiVMH+NKTxSypDtqhvqNU+A3UMQtLcQZpw9PaFdnWDk8Nk+zFFnn iNf4PI9xk+GJA8S2i12DioEWSYK16b/9tCaGlkS0wSYHOQDvT8ZlFC3EOWwUV2ErAyIJOty+1aNa o= Received-SPF: pass client-ip=185.26.156.221; envelope-from=christoph@grothesque.org; helo=dia.uberspace.de X-Spam_score_int: 0 X-Spam_score: -0.1 X-Spam_bar: / X-Spam_report: (-0.1 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_INVALID=0.1, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, FAKE_REPLY_C=1.486, MSGID_FROM_MTA_HEADER=0.001, PLING_QUERY=0.1, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Users list for the GNU Emacs text editor List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: help-gnu-emacs-bounces+geh-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: help-gnu-emacs-bounces+geh-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.help:142732 Archived-At: Eli Zaretskii wrote: > > From: Christoph Groth > > > > However, no other programs (including editors) seem to have > > a problem with this. So it really must be Emacs trying to be > > clever. > > Not clever, but flexible, powerful, and performant. Which other > program supports on-the-fly decoding of non-ASCII text in so many > encodings? No need to convince me. I have been living in Emacs since 1998. That said, the finding that Emacs does not read files until EOF surprised me quite a lot. I thought that it had solid underpinnings. > > Should I report this to bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org, or is posting on this > > list enough? Or should I open a ticket with debbugs.gnu.org? > > A bug for this already exists: bug#9800. A possible solution was also > pointed out there. Thanks, I did not manage to find this one.