From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Michael Heerdegen Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.help Subject: Re: [External] : Passing buffers to function in elisp Date: Sat, 25 Feb 2023 19:31:01 +0100 Message-ID: <878rglmwbe.fsf@web.de> References: <87mt56hg4e.fsf@iki.fi> <87bklihln8.fsf@iki.fi> <87pm9yf0ph.fsf@web.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="567"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) To: help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Cancel-Lock: sha1:8OO0fdBdQ+LpmstB/Fm1WYcaRr0= Original-X-From: help-gnu-emacs-bounces+geh-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Sat Feb 25 19:31:39 2023 Return-path: Envelope-to: geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1pVzKd-000AZY-D2 for geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Sat, 25 Feb 2023 19:31:39 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1pVzKC-0004Lp-To; Sat, 25 Feb 2023 13:31:12 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1pVzKA-0004LL-NH for help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 25 Feb 2023 13:31:10 -0500 Original-Received: from ciao.gmane.io ([116.202.254.214]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1pVzK9-0007EU-97 for help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 25 Feb 2023 13:31:10 -0500 Original-Received: from list by ciao.gmane.io with local (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1pVzK6-000A1C-8N for help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 25 Feb 2023 19:31:06 +0100 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ Received-SPF: pass client-ip=116.202.254.214; envelope-from=geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; helo=ciao.gmane.io X-Spam_score_int: -13 X-Spam_score: -1.4 X-Spam_bar: - X-Spam_report: (-1.4 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN=0.25, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.25, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Users list for the GNU Emacs text editor List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: help-gnu-emacs-bounces+geh-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: help-gnu-emacs-bounces+geh-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.help:142835 Archived-At: writes: > > If `emms-info-native--read-and-decode-ogg-page' is called very often > > (hundreds of times or more), it's probably better to use one single > > buffer instead of a fresh temp buffer every single time. Using temp > > buffers creates quite a bunch of garbage IME. > > And then do (erase-buffer) then (insert-file-contents-literally)? Yes. I had a case in my own personal code where recycling temp buffers made a big difference wrt garbage. Not sure if the cases are comparable, but I would give it a try. Michael.