From: Eric Hanchrow <offby1@blarg.net>
Subject: Re: text modes vs. programming language modes
Date: Tue, 22 Aug 2006 09:23:06 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <877j10d9jp.fsf@offby1.atm01.sea.blarg.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: ecf8bi$c35$1@sea.gmane.org
>>>>> "Kevin" == Kevin Rodgers <ihs_4664@yahoo.com> writes:
Kevin> Is there a reliable way to determine whether the current
Kevin> major mode is a text mode vs. a programming language mode?
I wouldn't think so, if for no other reason than that the terms aren't
well defined.
--
In the movie Ghostbusters, there's a sign in the background of
one scene that says, "Danger! 10,000 Ohms!" I cannot explain to
laymen why people like me think that is uproariously funny.
-- Steven den Beste
prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-08-22 16:23 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-08-22 15:38 text modes vs. programming language modes Kevin Rodgers
2006-08-22 16:23 ` Eric Hanchrow [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
List information: https://www.gnu.org/software/emacs/
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=877j10d9jp.fsf@offby1.atm01.sea.blarg.net \
--to=offby1@blarg.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).