unofficial mirror of help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Emanuel Berg <embe8573@student.uu.se>
To: help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org
Subject: Re: How to alphabetasize sections?
Date: Sat, 13 Sep 2014 07:27:14 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <8761gsjdjh.fsf@debian.uxu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: mailman.8797.1410571808.1147.help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org

Robert Thorpe <rt@robertthorpeconsulting.com> writes:

>> That's very creative, both of you, but isn't the
>> best way to move all the sections to separate files
>> and then put one-line references in the
>> "motherfile", and simply sort those with
>> `sort-lines'?
>
> I'd say it depends how long the sections they are. If
> they're quite short it's probably best to put them in
> one file. If they're longer than a few pages it's
> probably best to split them.

Yes, of course.

But: when you boil water, the changes from 50 degrees
to 51 degrees or 74 to 75 doesn't mean a thing. But
from 99 to 100 it means the water boils, i.e. has
changed state. Quantity has turned into quality.

If you, like the OP, has decided sorting is necessary
to keep it under control, then that tells me the switch
from 99 to 100 has already occurred. If there were few
or very short sections, sorting wouldn't cross your
mind to begin with, as the situation would have been
possible to grasp by inspection anyway.

Now, this is generally speaking. The OP knows her
situation and if she wants to sort it in one file, that
will be an improvement. But I wouldn't be surprised if
she, soon, will want to have separate files (at the
next stage of 99->100, or 999->1000 perhaps).

The advantages of an organized file system to express
purpose as well as all the practical boosts it gets you
- that's an overlooked thing. Many computer people do
it without thinking. But it still surprises me that you
very rarely read about it in books and tutorials.

-- 
underground experts united


       reply	other threads:[~2014-09-13  5:27 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <mailman.8797.1410571808.1147.help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org>
2014-09-13  5:27 ` Emanuel Berg [this message]
     [not found] <mailman.8788.1410564074.1147.help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org>
2014-09-13  0:00 ` How to alphabetasize sections? Emanuel Berg
2014-09-13  0:58   ` Thorsten Jolitz
2014-09-13  1:29   ` Robert Thorpe
2014-09-13  7:50   ` Thien-Thi Nguyen
     [not found]   ` <mailman.8807.1410594408.1147.help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org>
2014-09-13 19:22     ` Emanuel Berg
2014-09-15  7:27       ` Thien-Thi Nguyen
2014-09-12  0:29 Sharon Kimble
2014-09-12  7:11 ` Thien-Thi Nguyen
2014-09-12 23:20   ` Robert Thorpe
2014-09-12  7:11 ` Sharon Kimble

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

  List information: https://www.gnu.org/software/emacs/

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=8761gsjdjh.fsf@debian.uxu \
    --to=embe8573@student.uu.se \
    --cc=help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).