From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: Eric Abrahamsen <eric@ericabrahamsen.net>
Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.help
Subject: Re: How do I pass a variable defined in a wrapping let, to a lambda?
Date: Fri, 11 Mar 2022 18:19:55 -0800
Message-ID: <875yoj52us.fsf@ericabrahamsen.net>
References: <yqoonkl35jo1541.fsf@dod.no> <87k0d03vaw.fsf@ericabrahamsen.net>
 <8735joc5of.fsf@web.de>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214";
	logging-data="7752"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io"
User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/29.0.50 (gnu/linux)
To: help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org
Cancel-Lock: sha1:fKo3aNFVqTgfDLjX9VBUcVEp55w=
Original-X-From: help-gnu-emacs-bounces+geh-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Sat Mar 12 03:40:46 2022
Return-path: <help-gnu-emacs-bounces+geh-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org>
Envelope-to: geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org
Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17])
	by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256)
	(Exim 4.92)
	(envelope-from <help-gnu-emacs-bounces+geh-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org>)
	id 1nSrgU-0001vl-02
	for geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Sat, 12 Mar 2022 03:40:46 +0100
Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:37674 helo=lists1p.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1)
	(envelope-from <help-gnu-emacs-bounces+geh-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org>)
	id 1nSrgS-0002EN-Gv
	for geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Fri, 11 Mar 2022 21:40:44 -0500
Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:46500)
 by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256)
 (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from <geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org>)
 id 1nSrMV-0000k9-2A
 for help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 11 Mar 2022 21:20:07 -0500
Original-Received: from ciao.gmane.io ([116.202.254.214]:51204)
 by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256)
 (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from <geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org>)
 id 1nSrMT-0007K2-O1
 for help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 11 Mar 2022 21:20:06 -0500
Original-Received: from list by ciao.gmane.io with local (Exim 4.92)
 (envelope-from <geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org>)
 id 1nSrMR-0008jB-PY
 for help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 12 Mar 2022 03:20:03 +0100
X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/
Received-SPF: pass client-ip=116.202.254.214;
 envelope-from=geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; helo=ciao.gmane.io
X-Spam_score_int: -16
X-Spam_score: -1.7
X-Spam_bar: -
X-Spam_report: (-1.7 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9,
 HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.249, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001,
 T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
X-Spam_action: no action
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Fri, 11 Mar 2022 21:40:08 -0500
X-BeenThere: help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Users list for the GNU Emacs text editor <help-gnu-emacs.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/help-gnu-emacs>,
 <mailto:help-gnu-emacs-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/help-gnu-emacs>
List-Post: <mailto:help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:help-gnu-emacs-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/help-gnu-emacs>,
 <mailto:help-gnu-emacs-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: help-gnu-emacs-bounces+geh-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org
Original-Sender: "help-gnu-emacs"
 <help-gnu-emacs-bounces+geh-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org>
Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.help:136473
Archived-At: <http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.help/136473>

Michael Heerdegen <michael_heerdegen@web.de> writes:

> Hi Eric,
>
> you may want to find out what evaluating lexical-binding in the buffer
> with lexical-binding -> nil gives you.
>
> Second: (AFAIK...) be sure to reeval `steinars-test' with
> lexical-binding -> nil.  `steinars-test' defined using the lexical
> binding dialect will return a closure even when called in the
> dynamcially binding dialect.

Yeah, I tried to do the second experiment with the function and variable
names incremented, but I think I was just in too much of a hurry and missed
one of them out (using the previous `steinars-test' instead of the
newler function). Anyway, nice to recover some confidence...