From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Michael Heerdegen Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.help Subject: Re: A more specific/targeted version of macroexpand-all? Date: Thu, 09 Jun 2022 12:47:17 +0200 Message-ID: <875yla866i.fsf@web.de> References: <2515e8cf-c3cd-2322-2acd-f7e8144b95c2@protonmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="11187"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/29.0.50 (gnu/linux) To: help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Cancel-Lock: sha1:HE/ES7ymUGzUZ+XzT1ZXeO0rL8s= Original-X-From: help-gnu-emacs-bounces+geh-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Thu Jun 09 15:19:22 2022 Return-path: Envelope-to: geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1nzI4H-0002g5-Ca for geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Thu, 09 Jun 2022 15:19:21 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:58784 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1nzI4G-0005qU-0x for geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Thu, 09 Jun 2022 09:19:20 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:35526) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1nzFhI-0000HC-4q for help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 09 Jun 2022 06:47:28 -0400 Original-Received: from ciao.gmane.io ([116.202.254.214]:49818) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1nzFhG-0005Bt-HD for help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 09 Jun 2022 06:47:27 -0400 Original-Received: from list by ciao.gmane.io with local (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1nzFhE-00045m-0M for help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 09 Jun 2022 12:47:24 +0200 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ Received-SPF: pass client-ip=116.202.254.214; envelope-from=geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; helo=ciao.gmane.io X-Spam_score_int: -13 X-Spam_score: -1.4 X-Spam_bar: - X-Spam_report: (-1.4 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN=0.249, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.249, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Users list for the GNU Emacs text editor List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: help-gnu-emacs-bounces+geh-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "help-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.help:137550 Archived-At: Okamsn writes: > I have been able to explicitly prevent expansion of macros by including > them in the second argument of `macroexpand-all`, such as in > > (macroexpand-all my-code `((cl-block) (cl-return-from) ,@my-macros)) I didn't know that nil-valued bindings work there. > but that still leaves the possibility of other, unknown macros expanding > incorrectly. Why would they expand incorrectly? Not sure I understand what you want. Michael.