From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Emanuel Berg via Users list for the GNU Emacs text editor Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.help Subject: Re: [External] : Re: Emacs Modular Configuration: the preferable way. Date: Sat, 26 Jun 2021 02:17:59 +0200 Message-ID: <874kdl5vig.fsf@zoho.eu> References: <87pmwgdiyj.fsf@zoho.eu> <878s33dvd4.fsf@zoho.eu> Reply-To: Emanuel Berg Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="6552"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/28.0.50 (gnu/linux) To: help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Cancel-Lock: sha1:DU4zUlIzlWG5ZrlNnUKkRGyAD+w= Original-X-From: help-gnu-emacs-bounces+geh-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Sat Jun 26 02:18:54 2021 Return-path: Envelope-to: geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1lww29-0001TN-4j for geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Sat, 26 Jun 2021 02:18:53 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:46244 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lww27-0002g0-Dq for geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Fri, 25 Jun 2021 20:18:51 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:51704) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lww1a-0002fm-E7 for help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 25 Jun 2021 20:18:18 -0400 Original-Received: from ciao.gmane.io ([116.202.254.214]:53668) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lww1V-0007aP-Am for help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 25 Jun 2021 20:18:15 -0400 Original-Received: from list by ciao.gmane.io with local (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1lww1T-0000hC-4W for help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 26 Jun 2021 02:18:11 +0200 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ Mail-Followup-To: help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Mail-Copies-To: never Received-SPF: pass client-ip=116.202.254.214; envelope-from=geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; helo=ciao.gmane.io X-Spam_score_int: -15 X-Spam_score: -1.6 X-Spam_bar: - X-Spam_report: (-1.6 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.25, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: Users list for the GNU Emacs text editor List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: help-gnu-emacs-bounces+geh-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "help-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.help:131234 Archived-At: Drew Adams wrote: > Actually, ~/.emacs.d/emacs-init/erc/erc-iterate.el is > completely _platform independent_ when used in Emacs. > Emacs takes care of platform differences / > oddities automatically. > > Automatically, that is, provided code uses Elisp file-name > functions (or the predefined commands that use them)... But why don't put that in the functions where something can go wrong because they are the ones that should be responsible for that, using string functions on a string doesn't imply any danger whatsoever so if one wants to be safe that doesn't make it any more safe, because it is already safe. -- underground experts united https://dataswamp.org/~incal