From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Tomas Hlavaty Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.help Subject: Re: Advantage using mapc over dolist Date: Tue, 03 Dec 2024 18:55:56 +0100 Message-ID: <874j3ktzv7.fsf@neko.mail-host-address-is-not-set> References: <87zflevbwm.fsf@neko.mail-host-address-is-not-set> <87h67ku813.fsf@neko.mail-host-address-is-not-set> <87ed2ou65o.fsf@neko.mail-host-address-is-not-set> <87a5dcu5d5.fsf@neko.mail-host-address-is-not-set> <86ldww1yl3.fsf@gnu.org> <877c8gu0wv.fsf@neko.mail-host-address-is-not-set> <86iks01x7d.fsf@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="30587"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" To: Eli Zaretskii , help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Original-X-From: help-gnu-emacs-bounces+geh-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Tue Dec 03 18:56:40 2024 Return-path: Envelope-to: geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1tIX8a-0007jj-1v for geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Tue, 03 Dec 2024 18:56:40 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1tIX87-0007Dh-IC; Tue, 03 Dec 2024 12:56:11 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1tIX83-0007C9-TT for help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 03 Dec 2024 12:56:07 -0500 Original-Received: from logand.com ([37.48.87.44]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1tIX7v-0007Qb-E5; Tue, 03 Dec 2024 12:56:07 -0500 Original-Received: by logand.com (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 8A9571A036A; Tue, 3 Dec 2024 18:55:57 +0100 (CET) X-Mailer: emacs 29.4 (via feedmail 11-beta-1 I) In-Reply-To: <86iks01x7d.fsf@gnu.org> Received-SPF: pass client-ip=37.48.87.44; envelope-from=tom@logand.com; helo=logand.com X-Spam_score_int: -18 X-Spam_score: -1.9 X-Spam_bar: - X-Spam_report: (-1.9 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_CERTIFIED_BLOCKED=0.001, RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_RPBL_BLOCKED=0.001, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Users list for the GNU Emacs text editor List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: help-gnu-emacs-bounces+geh-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: help-gnu-emacs-bounces+geh-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.help:148548 Archived-At: On Tue 03 Dec 2024 at 19:40, Eli Zaretskii wrote: > If your only gripe is about the names of cl-case and cl-ecase, then > why mention pcase and cond*? they were not renamed and didn't come > from CL. And why is it "a mess"? You've made abundantly clear that > you didn't like the cl- names, why is there a need to add unrelated > accusations? in short, because people are directed to use pcase as the replacement for case and pcase-exhaustive as replacement for ecase