From: tyler <tyler.smith@mail.mcgill.ca>
To: help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org
Subject: Re: proper use of save-current-buffer, sleep-for not sleeping?
Date: Sun, 06 Apr 2008 23:24:25 -0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <873apy1jxi.fsf@blackbart.sedgenet> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 87ej9l2ev7.fsf@blackbart.sedgenet
tyler <tyler@blackbart.sedgenet> writes:
Further experimenting on the same bit of code reveals it's really not
doing what I thought it was doing. I determined that for larger
functions, which presumably take longer to process, the clean-up of the
target buffer was happening before the process returned all the output.
So I tried modifying the sleep-for time. At this point I realised that
the function was not sleeping at all! In the code below I expect a 10
second pause - why doesn't it happen?
As an aside, I now realise that accept-process-output is probably more
appropriate in this context. However, I can't make that work either.
Cheers,
Tyler
(defun ess-eval-region (start end toggle &optional message)
"Send the current region to the inferior ESS process.
With prefix argument toggle the meaning of `ess-eval-visibly-p';
this does not apply when using the S-plus GUI, see `ess-eval-region-ddeclient'."
(interactive "r\nP")
;;(untabify (point-min) (point-max))
;;(untabify start end); do we really need to save-excursion?
(ess-force-buffer-current "Process to load into: ")
(message "Starting evaluation...")
(if (ess-ddeclient-p)
(ess-eval-region-ddeclient start end 'even-empty)
;; else: "normal", non-DDE behavior:
(let ((visibly (if toggle (not ess-eval-visibly-p) ess-eval-visibly-p)))
(if visibly
(ess-eval-linewise (buffer-substring start end))
(if ess-synchronize-evals
(ess-eval-linewise (buffer-substring start end)
(or message "Eval region"))
;; else [almost always!]
(let ((sprocess (get-ess-process ess-current-process-name)))
(process-send-region sprocess start end)
(process-send-string sprocess "\n"))))))
;;;;;;;;;;; should be sleeping here!!! ;;;;;;;;;;;;;
(sleep-for 10)
;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;
(save-current-buffer
(set-buffer (get-ess-buffer ess-current-process-name))
(end-of-buffer)
(comint-bol)
(kill-line))
(message "Finished evaluation")
;; return value
(list start end))
prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-04-07 2:24 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-04-05 2:51 proper use of save-current-buffer tyler
2008-04-05 2:59 ` tyler
2008-04-05 3:35 ` gnus email address fixed [Re: proper use of save-current-buffer] tyler
2008-04-05 10:10 ` gnus email address fixed Reiner Steib
2008-04-07 2:24 ` tyler [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
List information: https://www.gnu.org/software/emacs/
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=873apy1jxi.fsf@blackbart.sedgenet \
--to=tyler.smith@mail.mcgill.ca \
--cc=help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).