From: Thorsten Jolitz <tjolitz@gmail.com>
To: help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org
Subject: Re: Different behaviour while debugging?
Date: Sat, 23 Feb 2013 10:07:22 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <8738wns8j9.fsf@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 5127BF5D.2060402@easy-emacs.de
Andreas Röhler <andreas.roehler@easy-emacs.de> writes:
>> I have the very strange case that a program - in some special situation
>> - does not work as expected, but when I instrument the relevant
>> function(s) for edebug and single-step through them, everythings works
>> as expected and the output is fine.
>
> IMHO that's possible, for example if some function expects faces, which are only there if
> fontification is done
At the surface of my application program, there are no faces involved,
its about recognizing if there is a comment on a line with
'comment-on-line-p', which calls 'comment-search-forward', which
searches for 'comment-start-skip'.
Since, when in html-mode, the following condition-case (inside a 'cond
structure) is never entered in normal execution but is correctly entered
when (e)debugging, I would guess the 'comment-on-line-p' makes the
difference.
,---------------------------------------------------
| ((and
| (save-excursion
| (not (eq (comment-on-line-p) (point-at-bol))))
| last-line-comment-p) ...)
`---------------------------------------------------
And, actually, if I edebug 'comment-search-forward', things work as
expected, just like when I edebug my own function that contains the
above condition-case.
> try some (sit-for) then
ok - thanks for the tip.
--
cheers,
Thorsten
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-02-23 9:07 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-02-20 14:57 Different behaviour while debugging? Thorsten Jolitz
2013-02-20 15:08 ` Drew Adams
2013-02-20 15:45 ` Thorsten Jolitz
2013-02-20 16:25 ` Drew Adams
2013-02-20 16:50 ` Thorsten Jolitz
2013-02-20 15:56 ` Stefan Monnier
2013-02-20 16:31 ` Thorsten Jolitz
2013-02-22 14:06 ` Stefan Monnier
2013-02-22 17:44 ` Thorsten Jolitz
2013-02-22 18:56 ` Andreas Röhler
2013-02-23 9:07 ` Thorsten Jolitz [this message]
2013-02-23 11:35 ` Andreas Röhler
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
List information: https://www.gnu.org/software/emacs/
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=8738wns8j9.fsf@gmail.com \
--to=tjolitz@gmail.com \
--cc=help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).