From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Emanuel Berg Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.help Subject: Re: Lookarounds and recursion in Emacs regexes Date: Mon, 06 Feb 2023 14:44:30 +0100 Message-ID: <87357i7vsx.fsf@dataswamp.org> References: <87h6wbeti3.fsf@mbork.pl> <877cx7n5an.fsf@dataswamp.org> <831qn4u0b4.fsf@gnu.org> <87bkm76jkr.fsf@dataswamp.org> <838rhbq66a.fsf@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="40249"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) To: help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Cancel-Lock: sha1:eRPpTHQJqaF9w3y5NQfZvMXbyvE= Original-X-From: help-gnu-emacs-bounces+geh-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Tue Feb 07 13:40:02 2023 Return-path: Envelope-to: geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1pPNGU-000AFZ-AV for geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Tue, 07 Feb 2023 13:40:02 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1pPNGB-00016X-4M; Tue, 07 Feb 2023 07:39:43 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1pP1na-00033Z-4R for help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 06 Feb 2023 08:44:46 -0500 Original-Received: from ciao.gmane.io ([116.202.254.214]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1pP1nV-0006KP-1Y for help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 06 Feb 2023 08:44:45 -0500 Original-Received: from list by ciao.gmane.io with local (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1pP1nS-0005EV-PW for help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 06 Feb 2023 14:44:38 +0100 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ Mail-Followup-To: help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Mail-Copies-To: never Received-SPF: pass client-ip=116.202.254.214; envelope-from=geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; helo=ciao.gmane.io X-Spam_score_int: -16 X-Spam_score: -1.7 X-Spam_bar: - X-Spam_report: (-1.7 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.249, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-Mailman-Approved-At: Tue, 07 Feb 2023 07:39:39 -0500 X-BeenThere: help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Users list for the GNU Emacs text editor List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: help-gnu-emacs-bounces+geh-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: help-gnu-emacs-bounces+geh-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.help:142634 Archived-At: Eli Zaretskii wrote: >>>> It doesn't prevent adding other extension languages, nor >>>> even does it necessarily prevent changing the >>>> implementation language to another one in theory. >>> >>> Indeed, but replacing ELisp would probably need to rewrite >>> a lot of internals currently implemented in C, since most, >>> if not all, of them are currently very tightly coupled >>> with Lisp and assume the existence and >>> design/implementation of various aspects of the >>> Lisp machine. >> >> I don't think anyone suggests replacing Elisp > > Stefan did, in the part cited above. he didn't suggest it, > but he said it's not prevented. And I replied to that part. It depends, I suppose as long as that's only part of the reply? -- underground experts united https://dataswamp.org/~incal