From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Bastien Guerry Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.help Subject: Re: code completion Date: Wed, 12 Mar 2008 12:07:50 +0000 Message-ID: <871w6g87s9.fsf@bzg.ath.cx> References: <47D69250.6050902@telenet.be> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1205323705 8091 80.91.229.12 (12 Mar 2008 12:08:25 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 12 Mar 2008 12:08:25 +0000 (UTC) Cc: help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org To: Richard G Riley Original-X-From: help-gnu-emacs-bounces+geh-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Mar 12 13:08:53 2008 Return-path: Envelope-to: geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1JZPlL-0006CP-Ol for geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Wed, 12 Mar 2008 13:08:52 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1JZPkn-0004RI-9f for geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Wed, 12 Mar 2008 08:08:17 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1JZPkX-0004Q4-GI for help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 12 Mar 2008 08:08:01 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1JZPkV-0004PI-So for help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 12 Mar 2008 08:08:00 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1JZPkV-0004P3-E3 for help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 12 Mar 2008 08:07:59 -0400 Original-Received: from mu-out-0910.google.com ([209.85.134.189]) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1JZPkV-00061m-4R for help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 12 Mar 2008 08:07:59 -0400 Original-Received: by mu-out-0910.google.com with SMTP id g7so3437490muf.0 for ; Wed, 12 Mar 2008 05:07:57 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:received:from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:references:user-agent:date:message-id:mime-version:content-type:sender; bh=dyEZ0fWVpPXv6HPzrjWPUlUaMhoT2oBy5HQFm8SD+LQ=; b=LaCiaEwPB906sMkCr8Qklj7TaUDssi2Envxj4zJTN6UpxOyUeVhRHPCBVEM9oMhMe0qCKDntaWM8pbTzhYCFd1QcuNw5gV22PpkRy4uRqAdn5oUALA1MKweEhWGg7OrvUkxVJizDaq9kO7EKb366jPWv/zG4WMe/h9SnoGdvcyU= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:references:user-agent:date:message-id:mime-version:content-type:sender; b=ipcv1xDkyPc22wM8ED1aQtsLweDVoQXncfoWoGmcQ23odMw+VCYcaIPZqOLhi2ax/6eIyuZh9ym0ngff+2GhYc9VOVbGrcJJ2kfsM5/SMkAO9XprUEkw45VFAMIScYeIJtBGtzAPEOHwHsPhI6IxQaCOsXnOBOx9273IcnX2ZmA= Original-Received: by 10.78.168.6 with SMTP id q6mr21476894hue.65.1205323674191; Wed, 12 Mar 2008 05:07:54 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: from bzg.ath.cx ( [81.99.213.34]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id c24sm2858051ika.10.2008.03.12.05.07.52 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Wed, 12 Mar 2008 05:07:53 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: by bzg.ath.cx (Postfix, from userid 1000) id AB076157971; Wed, 12 Mar 2008 12:07:50 +0000 (GMT) In-Reply-To: (Richard G. Riley's message of "Wed, 12 Mar 2008 12:23:49 +0100") User-Agent: Gnus/5.110007 (No Gnus v0.7) Emacs/23.0.60 (gnu/linux) X-detected-kernel: by monty-python.gnu.org: Linux 2.6 (newer, 2) X-BeenThere: help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Users list for the GNU Emacs text editor List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: help-gnu-emacs-bounces+geh-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: help-gnu-emacs-bounces+geh-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.help:52286 Archived-At: Richard G Riley writes: > Last night a I spent a few hours downloading and installing and > configuring the latest cedet. After setting up project paths, c-paths > and turning on the semantic idle completion scheduler it works > reasonably well for C. Only things that did not complete were fields > protected by guard flags (to be expected), structs represented by > typedefs and structs defined in the c file as opposed to an h file - I'm > not sure if by design or not - but this is quite a subset. I guess the OP will find this useful. -- Bastien