From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Emanuel Berg Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.help Subject: Re: evidence: nano(1) is *NOT* better than Emacs Date: Mon, 17 Nov 2014 23:23:03 +0100 Organization: Aioe.org NNTP Server Message-ID: <871tp1o4ag.fsf@debian.uxu> References: <87egt4ulg4.fsf@debian.uxu> <877fyvh97x.fsf@debian.uxu> <87h9xyn8fk.fsf@debian.uxu> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1416263123 22565 80.91.229.3 (17 Nov 2014 22:25:23 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 17 Nov 2014 22:25:23 +0000 (UTC) To: help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Original-X-From: help-gnu-emacs-bounces+geh-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Nov 17 23:25:18 2014 Return-path: Envelope-to: geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1XqUjW-0003Pq-0N for geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Mon, 17 Nov 2014 23:25:18 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:50515 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XqUjV-0006Tz-H7 for geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Mon, 17 Nov 2014 17:25:17 -0500 Original-Path: usenet.stanford.edu!news.kjsl.com!feeder.erje.net!eu.feeder.erje.net!news2.arglkargh.de!news.mixmin.net!aioe.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail Original-Newsgroups: gnu.emacs.help Original-Lines: 29 Original-NNTP-Posting-Host: feB02bRejf23rfBm51Mt7Q.user.speranza.aioe.org Original-X-Complaints-To: abuse@aioe.org User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.4 (gnu/linux) X-Notice: Filtered by postfilter v. 0.8.2 Cancel-Lock: sha1:DTgpbRnRPhBtWVCbBY5Uxsig4h4= Mail-Copies-To: never Original-Xref: usenet.stanford.edu gnu.emacs.help:208728 X-BeenThere: help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: Users list for the GNU Emacs text editor List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: help-gnu-emacs-bounces+geh-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: help-gnu-emacs-bounces+geh-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.help:101006 Archived-At: Dan Espen writes: > Pardon my saying so, but that's ridiculous. > > In the case of Emacs, you rule out any changes. Then > you make changes to Nano and claim victory. With configuration, all bets are of. We can have a competition - who can make Emacs look the best, and who can make nano look the best? That'd be interesting but the judges' call would be disputed I think even if unanimous (which is remote). Without configuration, as it shows in the screenshot I posted, I think nano looks the best with respect to the syntax highlighting. So I'm sorry, nano ownz you. It is the 1337 stuff. Deal with it. And... check out: http://user.it.uu.se/~embe8573/emacs.html Kind of creative Emacs use especially for a guy who rules out changes to Emacs? :) -- underground experts united