From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: dieter@duenenhof-wilhelm.de (H. Dieter Wilhelm) Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.help Subject: Re: OK, so I've thrown Ido out and turned on Icicles. What now? Date: Mon, 17 Nov 2014 17:02:08 +0100 Organization: The Church of Emacs Message-ID: <871tp13jen.fsf@vsl28t2g.ww011> References: <87r3x2rpbh.fsf@wmi.amu.edu.pl> <8761ee2d5l.fsf@vsl28t2g.ww011> <82212551-d603-4f06-8438-ab994e2e238e@default> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1416240172 19918 80.91.229.3 (17 Nov 2014 16:02:52 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 17 Nov 2014 16:02:52 +0000 (UTC) To: help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Original-X-From: help-gnu-emacs-bounces+geh-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Nov 17 17:02:43 2014 Return-path: Envelope-to: geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1XqOlF-0008Sy-Ls for geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Mon, 17 Nov 2014 17:02:41 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:48607 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XqOlF-0004EG-At for geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Mon, 17 Nov 2014 11:02:41 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:44298) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XqOku-0004DB-PZ for help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 17 Nov 2014 11:02:26 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XqOkp-0006hD-V2 for help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 17 Nov 2014 11:02:20 -0500 Original-Received: from mail-wi0-x22d.google.com ([2a00:1450:400c:c05::22d]:53382) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XqOkp-0006gu-Nz for help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 17 Nov 2014 11:02:15 -0500 Original-Received: by mail-wi0-f173.google.com with SMTP id r20so3024695wiv.6 for ; Mon, 17 Nov 2014 08:02:13 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=sender:from:to:subject:organization:references:date:in-reply-to :message-id:user-agent:mime-version:content-type; bh=XJr6zyaCYgBsRWULWTdI5fTLAU8wGAvizHiVOY7jjbo=; b=hExdaHBRHtq0ybVMHbhF4Ljd3dF0z8H5hGwd7rABBKGRT6LfO+6tKj+Tf9o2yi7fv+ O0//L4C4A/KC0rFfCzNPBmgvmivBrDoeHXIWeT+USXKNRO6lb7W1LgJ8Ev+S+h/5ljkj jg7vfD1cVGF9qt2/1DqTjzBqi4VwQcuNtB+16LsUuySvCnn1q6SZk7qMVEua0fLwUCuP dBjpHovHfQcHu44exVL1p+EveBG9pd5y+KTgnJ9tNMi4RkdFsL/VTg2idWWEQAo9HBFe AiF/JYa0gncChJHc/FZDLWRP4xuTo59cKKhVXhw/SvpYfb8Kae0EnrpBDE7K1Fu0VFvF I0gg== X-Received: by 10.180.20.201 with SMTP id p9mr32469265wie.67.1416240131205; Mon, 17 Nov 2014 08:02:11 -0800 (PST) Original-Received: from vsl28t2g.ww011 (p4FD4FC9F.dip0.t-ipconnect.de. [79.212.252.159]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id cq4sm7820796wjc.35.2014.11.17.08.02.09 for (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Mon, 17 Nov 2014 08:02:09 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <82212551-d603-4f06-8438-ab994e2e238e@default> (Drew Adams's message of "Mon, 17 Nov 2014 07:08:42 -0800 (PST)") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.4 (gnu/linux) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Error: Malformed IPv6 address (bad octet value). X-Received-From: 2a00:1450:400c:c05::22d X-BeenThere: help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: Users list for the GNU Emacs text editor List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: help-gnu-emacs-bounces+geh-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: help-gnu-emacs-bounces+geh-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.help:100995 Archived-At: Drew Adams writes: >> > Now I'll try to read the quide on the wiki, in small part, and >> > replace my Ido habits with Icicles-related ones. >> >> Interesting. It would be nice, if you could follow-up this thread >> with your findings after a while.. >> >> PS: As far as I checked (default) Ido worked only for files and >> buffers. > > 3rd-party Ido library `ido-ubiquitous.el' mitigates this. > https://github.com/technomancy/ido-ubiquitous > >> And its keybinding RET clashed with (default) icomplete-mode. I >> switched Ido off because it confused my small brain. Is Icicles in >> this respect somehow smoother? > > Dunno. Ido mode is incompatible with Icicle mode. But you can > get behavior somewhat similar to that of Ido while in Icicle mode. > http://www.emacswiki.org/emacs/Icicles_-_Ido_and_IswitchB. Not > that I recommend that. > > Anyway, Icicles is compatible with Icomplete mode (and with IswitchB). That is good to know, thanks -- Best wishes H. Dieter Wilhelm Darmstadt, Germany