From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: Michael Heerdegen via Users list for the GNU Emacs text editor <help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org>
Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.help
Subject: Re: Advantage using mapc over dolist
Date: Mon, 02 Dec 2024 11:12:37 +0100
Message-ID: <871pyqfl62.fsf@web.de>
References: <ntHkGUUb3o3cQKVmEDlafNbv34pCUpVybXn2FNJra1lUNdN-H8hIqGpFJc-hz7ZaForiSd5KkBmAu7BX7xzWG_oFtdu2w0syxnkFIz43q-Y=@protonmail.com>
 <87ed2qpo3o.fsf@gnu.org>
Reply-To: Michael Heerdegen <michael_heerdegen@web.de>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214";
	logging-data="18803"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io"
User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13)
To: help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org
Cancel-Lock: sha1:pdId4ZimRoXNzWNoCEUNfUYbEEw=
Original-X-From: help-gnu-emacs-bounces+geh-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Mon Dec 02 11:12:23 2024
Return-path: <help-gnu-emacs-bounces+geh-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org>
Envelope-to: geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org
Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17])
	by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256)
	(Exim 4.92)
	(envelope-from <help-gnu-emacs-bounces+geh-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org>)
	id 1tI3Pi-0004fB-Tp
	for geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Mon, 02 Dec 2024 11:12:22 +0100
Original-Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1)
	(envelope-from <help-gnu-emacs-bounces@gnu.org>)
	id 1tI3P9-0002vA-L1; Mon, 02 Dec 2024 05:11:47 -0500
Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10])
 by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256)
 (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from <geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org>)
 id 1tI3P6-0002ux-Ji
 for help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 02 Dec 2024 05:11:44 -0500
Original-Received: from ciao.gmane.io ([116.202.254.214])
 by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256)
 (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from <geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org>)
 id 1tI3P5-0006N8-7U
 for help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 02 Dec 2024 05:11:44 -0500
Original-Received: from list by ciao.gmane.io with local (Exim 4.92)
 (envelope-from <geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org>)
 id 1tI3P1-0003v3-OI
 for help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 02 Dec 2024 11:11:39 +0100
X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/
Received-SPF: pass client-ip=116.202.254.214;
 envelope-from=geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; helo=ciao.gmane.io
X-Spam_score_int: -18
X-Spam_score: -1.9
X-Spam_bar: -
X-Spam_report: (-1.9 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9,
 FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN=0.001, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001,
 HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.001, RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_RPBL_BLOCKED=0.001,
 RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_SAFE_BLOCKED=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001,
 SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
X-Spam_action: no action
X-BeenThere: help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Users list for the GNU Emacs text editor <help-gnu-emacs.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/help-gnu-emacs>,
 <mailto:help-gnu-emacs-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/help-gnu-emacs>
List-Post: <mailto:help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:help-gnu-emacs-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/help-gnu-emacs>,
 <mailto:help-gnu-emacs-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: help-gnu-emacs-bounces+geh-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org
Original-Sender: help-gnu-emacs-bounces+geh-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org
Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.help:148488
Archived-At: <http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.help/148488>

Tassilo Horn <tsdh@gnu.org> writes:

> But it's essentially a question of preference.

Yes, that.

If execution speed is crucial, IIRC at least for byte compiled code the
`dolist' version generates significantly faster code.

Michael.