From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Greg Farough Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.help Subject: Re: Gnus: Permanently killing a thread? Date: Wed, 11 Dec 2024 15:42:56 -0500 Message-ID: <86ttba7xyn.fsf@gnu.org> References: <87ldwmgo15.fsf@librehacker.com> <87jzc63xve.fsf@gmail.com> <87h67age6f.fsf@librehacker.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="39938"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) To: help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Cancel-Lock: sha1:4u79ME2nMCbaqjhKwhtAVqeT1Hs= Original-X-From: help-gnu-emacs-bounces+geh-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Wed Dec 11 21:45:50 2024 Return-path: Envelope-to: geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1tLTaf-000ACd-SY for geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Wed, 11 Dec 2024 21:45:49 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1tLTZy-0007wO-R3; Wed, 11 Dec 2024 15:45:06 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1tLTZx-0007ui-HZ for help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 11 Dec 2024 15:45:05 -0500 Original-Received: from ciao.gmane.io ([116.202.254.214]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1tLTZw-0007nz-4v for help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 11 Dec 2024 15:45:05 -0500 Original-Received: from list by ciao.gmane.io with local (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1tLTZt-0009NR-PZ for help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 11 Dec 2024 21:45:01 +0100 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ Received-SPF: pass client-ip=116.202.254.214; envelope-from=geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; helo=ciao.gmane.io X-Spam_score_int: -15 X-Spam_score: -1.6 X-Spam_bar: - X-Spam_report: (-1.6 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.249, RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_CERTIFIED_BLOCKED=0.001, RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_RPBL_BLOCKED=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Users list for the GNU Emacs text editor List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: help-gnu-emacs-bounces+geh-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: help-gnu-emacs-bounces+geh-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.help:148763 Archived-At: On Wed, Dec 11 2024, Christopher Howard wrote: > Robert Pluim writes: > >> ..kill files are allegedly slow. So what you do instead is 'L', which >> allows you to lower the score of a thread, and then you can use 'V x' >> to set the score below which messages are automatically hidden (I >> donʼt remember offhand if the effect of 'V x' is permanent or not, as >> I donʼt really use scoring). > > The score approaches sounds find, except I was just wondering: Is the > score somehow portable across multiple computers? I use multiple > backends, including nnimap, nnatom, nnrss, and nntp. However, focusing > on the IMAP messages, it seems that if I mark a message as read (which > I think is basically the same thing as "killing" it) then the message > is still marked as read when I login via Gnus on a different computer. > Would hiding still work if I was just marking messages with a low > score? > > I only use nnatom, nnrss, and nntp on one computer, but the nnimap, > including the mailing list groups, are used from both computers. I personally sync my score file across computers through Syncthing. -g -- "I want the freedom and the Guile."