From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Emanuel Berg Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.help Subject: Re: (interactive) call or form? Date: Sun, 08 Apr 2018 16:52:55 +0200 Organization: Aioe.org NNTP Server Message-ID: <86lgdxrbqw.fsf@zoho.com> References: <87a7uee4oc.fsf@mbork.pl> NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1523199208 2800 195.159.176.226 (8 Apr 2018 14:53:28 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 8 Apr 2018 14:53:28 +0000 (UTC) User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.4 (gnu/linux) To: help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Original-X-From: help-gnu-emacs-bounces+geh-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sun Apr 08 16:53:24 2018 Return-path: Envelope-to: geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1f5Bh5-0000c3-Ml for geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sun, 08 Apr 2018 16:53:23 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:60091 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1f5Bj9-0000oo-FP for geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sun, 08 Apr 2018 10:55:31 -0400 Original-Path: usenet.stanford.edu!goblin1!goblin2!goblin.stu.neva.ru!aioe.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail Original-Newsgroups: gnu.emacs.help Original-Lines: 20 Original-NNTP-Posting-Host: ey7daRps1n1jd+mMaOEjpw.user.gioia.aioe.org Original-X-Complaints-To: abuse@aioe.org X-Notice: Filtered by postfilter v. 0.8.3 Cancel-Lock: sha1:vN3WbK3rO+vqYOwHh2W+vVJlpok= Mail-Copies-To: never Original-Xref: usenet.stanford.edu gnu.emacs.help:222286 X-BeenThere: help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: Users list for the GNU Emacs text editor List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: help-gnu-emacs-bounces+geh-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "help-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.help:116407 Archived-At: Michael Heerdegen wrote: > The manual very often calls it a "form", so > it's probably ok to use this term. Just who is expected to read Borkowski's article? Because "form" isn't that widely known and in the Lisp sense it isn't even included in @book{oxford-dictionary-of-computing, title = {Oxford Dictionary of Computing}, author = {John Daintith and Edmund Wright}, publisher = {Oxford University Press}, year = 2010, ISBN = 0199234000 } -- underground experts united http://user.it.uu.se/~embe8573