From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Emanuel Berg Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.help Subject: Re: return first element in list with certain property Date: Tue, 06 Mar 2018 09:53:32 +0100 Organization: Aioe.org NNTP Server Message-ID: <86k1upshyr.fsf@zoho.com> References: <8660a60zjn.fsf@zoho.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1520326411 26556 195.159.176.226 (6 Mar 2018 08:53:31 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 6 Mar 2018 08:53:31 +0000 (UTC) User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.4 (gnu/linux) To: help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Original-X-From: help-gnu-emacs-bounces+geh-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Mar 06 09:53:27 2018 Return-path: Envelope-to: geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1et8LY-0005XM-C1 for geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Tue, 06 Mar 2018 09:53:20 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:54217 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1et8Nb-00041l-5D for geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Tue, 06 Mar 2018 03:55:27 -0500 Original-Path: usenet.stanford.edu!goblin2!goblin.stu.neva.ru!aioe.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail Original-Newsgroups: gnu.emacs.help Original-Lines: 15 Original-NNTP-Posting-Host: UHWYWQF2IuZrSKObhXEbig.user.gioia.aioe.org Original-X-Complaints-To: abuse@aioe.org X-Notice: Filtered by postfilter v. 0.8.3 Cancel-Lock: sha1:RVq9346t8Jf4OKRedBx9u+f+hu8= Mail-Copies-To: never Original-Xref: usenet.stanford.edu gnu.emacs.help:221999 X-BeenThere: help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: Users list for the GNU Emacs text editor List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: help-gnu-emacs-bounces+geh-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "help-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.help:116114 Archived-At: Robert L. wrote: >> cl-find-if > > (defun list-find-if (pred xs) > (while (and (consp xs) (not (funcall pred (car xs)))) > (pop xs)) > (car xs)) OK, but without having tested it, is there any reason to favor it to `cl-find-if'? -- underground experts united http://user.it.uu.se/~embe8573