From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Kai Grossjohann Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.help Subject: Re: Binding same command to two separte keys?? Date: Mon, 16 Apr 2007 12:17:57 +0200 Message-ID: <86abx8ei7e.fsf@ketchup.de.uu.net> References: <1176490954.3065.75.camel@CASE> <1176491561.32280.9.camel@oaktree.karlheg.lan> <461FD736.2080709@gatech.edu> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1176718765 12741 80.91.229.12 (16 Apr 2007 10:19:25 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 16 Apr 2007 10:19:25 +0000 (UTC) To: help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Original-X-From: help-gnu-emacs-bounces+geh-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Apr 16 12:19:19 2007 Return-path: Envelope-to: geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1HdOIp-0008AE-65 for geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Mon, 16 Apr 2007 12:19:19 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1HdONP-0006vY-4B for geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Mon, 16 Apr 2007 06:24:03 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1HdOMX-0006vD-KX for help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 16 Apr 2007 06:23:09 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1HdOMV-0006uN-FI for help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 16 Apr 2007 06:23:09 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1HdOMV-0006uC-0l for help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 16 Apr 2007 06:23:07 -0400 Original-Received: from main.gmane.org ([80.91.229.2] helo=ciao.gmane.org) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1HdOHt-00045H-82 for help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 16 Apr 2007 06:18:21 -0400 Original-Received: from list by ciao.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.43) id 1HdOHm-0004EO-FZ for help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 16 Apr 2007 12:18:19 +0200 Original-Received: from de-lt-054776l.eu.frd.uu.net ([62.191.185.105]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Mon, 16 Apr 2007 12:18:14 +0200 Original-Received: from kai by de-lt-054776l.eu.frd.uu.net with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Mon, 16 Apr 2007 12:18:14 +0200 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ Original-Lines: 12 Original-X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: de-lt-054776l.eu.frd.uu.net User-Agent: Gnus/5.110006 (No Gnus v0.6) Emacs/22.0.97 (gnu/linux) Cancel-Lock: sha1:YQ0PFDL0ZBZ7jlQrY80lPT7mpRg= X-detected-kernel: Linux 2.6, seldom 2.4 (older, 4) X-BeenThere: help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Users list for the GNU Emacs text editor List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: help-gnu-emacs-bounces+geh-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: help-gnu-emacs-bounces+geh-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.help:42723 Archived-At: Matthew Flaschen writes: > There's no need for kbd here. It's unnecessary overhead. In some places, Emacs prints keybindings. For instance, after C-h c, C-h w, C-h l. The main advantage of kbd is that it accepts the syntax printed by Emacs itself. IMHO this is a big advantage. Kai