* "Rmail": Key "o" sometimes marks wrong mail as deleted
@ 2024-06-11 15:28 Dr Rainer Woitok
2024-06-11 15:43 ` Eli Zaretskii
0 siblings, 1 reply; 9+ messages in thread
From: Dr Rainer Woitok @ 2024-06-11 15:28 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Help-Gnu-Emacs
Greetings,
In my "Rmail" configuration file I have set "rmail-delete-after-output"
to t.
When the summary buffer is active and I run "o target" on a mail which
is not the last in the summary buffer, the current mail is correctly co-
pied to the target mail folder, but in the summary buffer the mail AFTER
the current mail is marked as deleted.
When I do the same while the message buffer is active, the COPIED mail
is correctly marked as deleted in the summary buffer.
Is this a bug or a feature? I'm on Emacs 28.2, in case that matters.
Sincerely,
Rainer
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* Re: "Rmail": Key "o" sometimes marks wrong mail as deleted
2024-06-11 15:28 "Rmail": Key "o" sometimes marks wrong mail as deleted Dr Rainer Woitok
@ 2024-06-11 15:43 ` Eli Zaretskii
2024-06-12 11:27 ` Dr Rainer Woitok
0 siblings, 1 reply; 9+ messages in thread
From: Eli Zaretskii @ 2024-06-11 15:43 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Help-Gnu-Emacs
> From: Dr Rainer Woitok <rainer.woitok@gmail.com>
> Date: Tue, 11 Jun 2024 17:28:27 +0200
>
> In my "Rmail" configuration file I have set "rmail-delete-after-output"
> to t.
>
> When the summary buffer is active and I run "o target" on a mail which
> is not the last in the summary buffer, the current mail is correctly co-
> pied to the target mail folder, but in the summary buffer the mail AFTER
> the current mail is marked as deleted.
>
> When I do the same while the message buffer is active, the COPIED mail
> is correctly marked as deleted in the summary buffer.
>
> Is this a bug or a feature? I'm on Emacs 28.2, in case that matters.
I cannot reproduce this buggy behavior, neither in Emacs 28.2 nor in
Emacs 29.
Do you see this in "emacs -Q"? If not, then some of your
customizations cause this somehow.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* Re: "Rmail": Key "o" sometimes marks wrong mail as deleted
2024-06-11 15:43 ` Eli Zaretskii
@ 2024-06-12 11:27 ` Dr Rainer Woitok
2024-06-12 11:56 ` Eli Zaretskii
0 siblings, 1 reply; 9+ messages in thread
From: Dr Rainer Woitok @ 2024-06-12 11:27 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Eli Zaretskii; +Cc: Help-Gnu-Emacs
Eli,
On Tue, 11 Jun 2024 18:43:12 +0300 you wrote:
> ...
> I cannot reproduce this buggy behavior, neither in Emacs 28.2 nor in
> Emacs 29.
>
> Do you see this in "emacs -Q"?
Yes. At least when I load my personal "Rmail" configuration. So I've
bisected my variable definitions and found the culprit to be variable
"rmail-output-reset-deleted-flag". If it also has a non-nil value (to-
gether with variable "rmail-delete-after-output") and the summary buffer
is selected, rather than the current the following mail (if existing)
will reliably be marked deleted.
My reading of the "rmail-output-reset-deleted-flag" docstring was a mail
marked as deleted will be stored in a target mail folder without "delet-
ed" flag and of the docstring of "rmail-delete-after-output" that a mail
is either moved or copied to the target folder. But somehow these two
concepts seem to subtly interfere.
Sincerely,
Rainer
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* Re: "Rmail": Key "o" sometimes marks wrong mail as deleted
2024-06-12 11:27 ` Dr Rainer Woitok
@ 2024-06-12 11:56 ` Eli Zaretskii
2024-06-13 8:24 ` Dr Rainer Woitok
0 siblings, 1 reply; 9+ messages in thread
From: Eli Zaretskii @ 2024-06-12 11:56 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Help-Gnu-Emacs
> From: Dr Rainer Woitok <rainer.woitok@gmail.com>
> Date: Wed, 12 Jun 2024 13:27:30 +0200
> Cc: Help-Gnu-Emacs@Gnu.Org
>
> > I cannot reproduce this buggy behavior, neither in Emacs 28.2 nor in
> > Emacs 29.
> >
> > Do you see this in "emacs -Q"?
>
> Yes. At least when I load my personal "Rmail" configuration. So I've
> bisected my variable definitions and found the culprit to be variable
> "rmail-output-reset-deleted-flag". If it also has a non-nil value (to-
> gether with variable "rmail-delete-after-output") and the summary buffer
> is selected, rather than the current the following mail (if existing)
> will reliably be marked deleted.
Ah, okay. This bug is already fixed in Emacs 29, so when you upgrade
your Emacs, you will be free from it.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* Re: "Rmail": Key "o" sometimes marks wrong mail as deleted
2024-06-12 11:56 ` Eli Zaretskii
@ 2024-06-13 8:24 ` Dr Rainer Woitok
2024-06-13 8:39 ` Eli Zaretskii
0 siblings, 1 reply; 9+ messages in thread
From: Dr Rainer Woitok @ 2024-06-13 8:24 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Eli Zaretskii; +Cc: Help-Gnu-Emacs
Eli,
On Wed, 12 Jun 2024 14:56:51 +0300 you said;
> ...
> Ah, okay. This bug is already fixed in Emacs 29, so when you upgrade
> your Emacs, you will be free from it.
Currently I can't upgrade to Emacs 29 because in my current environment
Emacs 29 ignores or misinterprets any "--geometry" specifications on the
command line, while Emacs 28.2 is correctly following them. I'm cur-
rently trying to find out which other software components might be in-
volved.
So is there a chance that this patch is backported to Emacs 28.2?
Sincerely,
Rainer
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* Re: "Rmail": Key "o" sometimes marks wrong mail as deleted
2024-06-13 8:24 ` Dr Rainer Woitok
@ 2024-06-13 8:39 ` Eli Zaretskii
2024-06-13 15:48 ` Dr Rainer Woitok
0 siblings, 1 reply; 9+ messages in thread
From: Eli Zaretskii @ 2024-06-13 8:39 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Help-Gnu-Emacs
> From: Dr Rainer Woitok <rainer.woitok@gmail.com>
> Date: Thu, 13 Jun 2024 10:24:50 +0200
> Cc: Help-Gnu-Emacs@Gnu.Org
>
> On Wed, 12 Jun 2024 14:56:51 +0300 you said;
>
> > ...
> > Ah, okay. This bug is already fixed in Emacs 29, so when you upgrade
> > your Emacs, you will be free from it.
>
> Currently I can't upgrade to Emacs 29 because in my current environment
> Emacs 29 ignores or misinterprets any "--geometry" specifications on the
> command line, while Emacs 28.2 is correctly following them. I'm cur-
> rently trying to find out which other software components might be in-
> volved.
>
> So is there a chance that this patch is backported to Emacs 28.2?
We no longer maintain the emacs-28 branch, but you could try
installing locally the patch below, which I think fixed this:
diff --git a/lisp/mail/rmailout.el b/lisp/mail/rmailout.el
index 49531ea..cfde335 100644
--- a/lisp/mail/rmailout.el
+++ b/lisp/mail/rmailout.el
@@ -579,7 +579,7 @@ rmail-output
(progn
(if rmail-delete-after-output
(rmail-delete-message))
- (if (> count 0)
+ (if (>= count 0)
(let ((msgnum rmail-current-message))
(rmail-next-message 1)
(eq rmail-current-message (1+ msgnum)))))
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* Re: "Rmail": Key "o" sometimes marks wrong mail as deleted
2024-06-13 8:39 ` Eli Zaretskii
@ 2024-06-13 15:48 ` Dr Rainer Woitok
2024-06-13 16:04 ` Eli Zaretskii
0 siblings, 1 reply; 9+ messages in thread
From: Dr Rainer Woitok @ 2024-06-13 15:48 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Eli Zaretskii; +Cc: Help-Gnu-Emacs
Eli,
On Thu, 13 Jun 2024 11:39:17 +0300 you wrote:
> ...
> you could try
> installing locally the patch below, which I think fixed this:
>
> diff --git a/lisp/mail/rmailout.el b/lisp/mail/rmailout.el
> index 49531ea..cfde335 100644
> --- a/lisp/mail/rmailout.el
> +++ b/lisp/mail/rmailout.el
> @@ -579,7 +579,7 @@ rmail-output
> (progn
> (if rmail-delete-after-output
> (rmail-delete-message))
> - (if (> count 0)
> + (if (>= count 0)
> (let ((msgnum rmail-current-message))
> (rmail-next-message 1)
> (eq rmail-current-message (1+ msgnum)))))
This will definitely not fix the misbehaviour I reported, because the
new line "(if (>= count 0)" is already in my 28.2 source file.
Sincerely,
Rainer
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* Re: "Rmail": Key "o" sometimes marks wrong mail as deleted
2024-06-13 15:48 ` Dr Rainer Woitok
@ 2024-06-13 16:04 ` Eli Zaretskii
2024-06-14 16:36 ` Dr Rainer Woitok
0 siblings, 1 reply; 9+ messages in thread
From: Eli Zaretskii @ 2024-06-13 16:04 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Help-Gnu-Emacs
> From: Dr Rainer Woitok <rainer.woitok@gmail.com>
> Date: Thu, 13 Jun 2024 17:48:33 +0200
> Cc: Help-Gnu-Emacs@Gnu.Org
>
> > diff --git a/lisp/mail/rmailout.el b/lisp/mail/rmailout.el
> > index 49531ea..cfde335 100644
> > --- a/lisp/mail/rmailout.el
> > +++ b/lisp/mail/rmailout.el
> > @@ -579,7 +579,7 @@ rmail-output
> > (progn
> > (if rmail-delete-after-output
> > (rmail-delete-message))
> > - (if (> count 0)
> > + (if (>= count 0)
> > (let ((msgnum rmail-current-message))
> > (rmail-next-message 1)
> > (eq rmail-current-message (1+ msgnum)))))
>
> This will definitely not fix the misbehaviour I reported, because the
> new line "(if (>= count 0)" is already in my 28.2 source file.
I'm just stabbing in the dark, you know. I have no magic wands, just
comparing relevant Rmail source files.
Maybe this one, then?
diff --git a/lisp/mail/rmailsum.el b/lisp/mail/rmailsum.el
index ba58090..21dec2b 100644
--- a/lisp/mail/rmailsum.el
+++ b/lisp/mail/rmailsum.el
@@ -1931,7 +1931,7 @@ rmail-summary-output
(progn (require 'rmailout)
(list (rmail-output-read-file-name)
(prefix-numeric-value current-prefix-arg))))
- (let ((i 0) prev-msg)
+ (let ((i 0) prev-msg curmsg)
(while
(and (< i n)
(progn (rmail-summary-goto-msg)
@@ -1942,7 +1942,11 @@ rmail-summary-output
(setq i (1+ i))
(with-current-buffer rmail-buffer
(let ((rmail-delete-after-output nil))
+ (setq curmsg rmail-current-message)
(rmail-output file-name 1)))
+ ;; rmail-output sometimes moves to the next message; undo that.
+ (or (= curmsg (rmail-summary-msg-number))
+ (rmail-summary-goto-msg curmsg))
(if rmail-delete-after-output
(rmail-summary-delete-forward nil)
(if (< i n)
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* Re: "Rmail": Key "o" sometimes marks wrong mail as deleted
2024-06-13 16:04 ` Eli Zaretskii
@ 2024-06-14 16:36 ` Dr Rainer Woitok
0 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: Dr Rainer Woitok @ 2024-06-14 16:36 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Eli Zaretskii; +Cc: Help-Gnu-Emacs
Eli,
On Thu, 13 Jun 2024 19:04:19 +0300 you wrote:
> ...
> I'm just stabbing in the dark, you know. I have no magic wands, just
> comparing relevant Rmail source files.
>
> Maybe this one, then?
Yes, this one seems very promising. Since I'm currently running "Rmail"
with "rmail-output-reset-deleted-flag" set to nil, I don't really NEED
that patch, but when I will have some spare time, I will try it. Thanks
a lot :-)
Sincerely,
Rainer
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2024-06-14 16:36 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2024-06-11 15:28 "Rmail": Key "o" sometimes marks wrong mail as deleted Dr Rainer Woitok
2024-06-11 15:43 ` Eli Zaretskii
2024-06-12 11:27 ` Dr Rainer Woitok
2024-06-12 11:56 ` Eli Zaretskii
2024-06-13 8:24 ` Dr Rainer Woitok
2024-06-13 8:39 ` Eli Zaretskii
2024-06-13 15:48 ` Dr Rainer Woitok
2024-06-13 16:04 ` Eli Zaretskii
2024-06-14 16:36 ` Dr Rainer Woitok
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).