unofficial mirror of help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>
To: help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org
Subject: Re: Remove MIME in Message mode when sending just text
Date: Thu, 25 Apr 2024 19:48:43 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <8634r91j84.fsf@gnu.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87wmolo4om.fsf@RISEUP> (message from BP25 on Thu, 25 Apr 2024 16:14:17 +0100)

> From: BP25 <bp25@riseup.net>
> Date: Thu, 25 Apr 2024 16:14:17 +0100
> 
> I use Message mode as opposed to Mail mode because I sometimes send
> attachments.

I also sometimes send attachments, but I do use mail-mode, because it
does support attachments: use the mail-add-attachment command to do
that.

> However most of the time I just send plain text messages:
> then Message mode nonetheless adds the MIME headers and because I make
> Rmail not display automatically the plain text part then I have to
> manually click RET every time. I don't want to fix this by customising
> Rmail more: how to make Message not uselessly add MIME when not required
> becaue the message is just plain text?

Not sure I understand: are you saying that message-mode sends plain
text body of email messages as MIME attachments?

> Also, I have occasionally received some messages which looks
> almost-MIME: they only have this header: Content-Type: text/plain;
> charset=Utf-8 (these messages are displayed by Rmail
> immediately). Shouldn't this header be absent or is this header usually
> required also for non-MIME messages?

It shouldn't matter.  Why are you bothered by that?

> I also want to say that on these such messages (and on non-MIME
> messages) then (rmail-mime) for some reason has the same effect of
> (rmail-toggle-header): is this on purpose?

That's not what I see here.  On my system, rmail-mime toggles the
display of the buttons that allow you to show/hide the various MIME
parts of the message.

> And instead on MIME messages, (rmail-toggle-header) and (rmail-mime)
> cannot activate simultaneously but doing one undoes the other: is this
> on purpose?

Yes.

> Finally, is it a policy of this mailing list not to reply to the sender
> of the messages ("reply to all")? Because I'm not subscribed and I have
> to look for replies to my messages on the public archive.

It depends on how people send responses: some send through news
gateway, others through the list server.  The local configuration of
the person who responses also affects that.



      reply	other threads:[~2024-04-25 16:48 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-04-25 15:14 Remove MIME in Message mode when sending just text BP25
2024-04-25 16:48 ` Eli Zaretskii [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

  List information: https://www.gnu.org/software/emacs/

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=8634r91j84.fsf@gnu.org \
    --to=eliz@gnu.org \
    --cc=help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).