From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Emanuel Berg via Users list for the GNU Emacs text editor Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.help Subject: Re: Best Emacs Mail client. Date: Sat, 30 Nov 2019 11:34:46 +0100 Message-ID: <861rtpwt2x.fsf@zoho.eu> References: <87blsxnjsw.wl-herbert@gojira.at> <86eexs51uf.fsf@zoho.eu> <86tv6ozcl9.fsf@zoho.eu> <86pnhcyyix.fsf@zoho.eu> <86blswyu71.fsf@zoho.eu> <0100016eb5f810f4-a9a6a5fe-d7a7-49b1-bc0f-8459d58a26f7-000000@email.amazonses.com> <86eexquspg.fsf@zoho.eu> Reply-To: Emanuel Berg Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Injection-Info: blaine.gmane.org; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:195.159.176.226"; logging-data="9772"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@blaine.gmane.org" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.1 (gnu/linux) To: help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Original-X-From: help-gnu-emacs-bounces+geh-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Nov 30 11:35:13 2019 Return-path: Envelope-to: geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1ib05o-0002NJ-AC for geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sat, 30 Nov 2019 11:35:12 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:39390 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1ib05n-0001n4-3u for geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sat, 30 Nov 2019 05:35:11 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:41280) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1ib05b-0001mx-AS for help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 30 Nov 2019 05:35:00 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ib05Y-0003Q9-1S for help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 30 Nov 2019 05:34:59 -0500 Original-Received: from 195-159-176-226.customer.powertech.no ([195.159.176.226]:47430 helo=blaine.gmane.org) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ib05X-0003OB-Qz for help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 30 Nov 2019 05:34:55 -0500 Original-Received: from list by blaine.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1ib05V-00020Z-Bo for help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 30 Nov 2019 11:34:53 +0100 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ Mail-Followup-To: help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Mail-Copies-To: never Cancel-Lock: sha1:FyQt+OZKE0OqMZDNahzV2bBVVxw= X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] [fuzzy] X-Received-From: 195.159.176.226 X-BeenThere: help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: Users list for the GNU Emacs text editor List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: help-gnu-emacs-bounces+geh-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "help-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.help:121955 Archived-At: VanL wrote: >> OK, well, starting Gnus and sending to Gmane >> does not imply any noticable delay for me. > > The start delay is ¾ minute. My last posting > to nntp had 3 minute delay. OK, I have no idea, this (and the Gnus startup delay of 45s) seem like, yeah, it shouldn't be. I never experienced any of it using Gnus for 10 years soon, I think. Maybe Comrade Ingebrigtsen and the gang are reading this and can offer some explanation/remedy just what is happening during those delays. -- underground experts united http://user.it.uu.se/~embe8573 https://dataswamp.org/~incal