From: David Kastrup <dak@gnu.org>
Subject: Re: Emacs or XEmacs?
Date: Sun, 22 May 2005 23:28:58 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <853bsf0x2d.fsf@lola.goethe.zz> (raw)
In-Reply-To: d6qser$tr6$1@news.net.uni-c.dk
"JS" <dsa.@asdf.com> writes:
> What are the difference between Emacs and XEmacs? Will they both run
> on WinXP and is one better for something that the other?
Pretty much every one agrees one about the difference being that one
looks excessively ugly, is something that the world does not need, has
developers hard to get along with who have an irresponsible release
policy and fail to get to grips with reality.
Unfortunately there is no agreement about which of the two editors is
that (some would even claim the same for both). So you probably need
to find out yourself.
--
David Kastrup, Kriemhildstr. 15, 44793 Bochum
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-05-22 21:28 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-05-22 21:14 Emacs or XEmacs? JS
2005-05-22 21:28 ` David Kastrup [this message]
2005-05-22 23:30 ` Tim Johnson
2005-05-23 5:23 ` It's me FKtPp ;)
2005-05-23 16:09 ` Drew Adams
2005-05-23 18:23 ` Alan Mackenzie
[not found] <mailman.1031732603.1996.help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org>
2002-09-14 8:33 ` emacs or xemacs? A. L. Meyers
[not found] <mailman.1031674809.15931.help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org>
2002-09-10 17:34 ` Alex Schroeder
2002-09-10 18:57 ` Lute Kamstra
2002-09-10 20:04 ` Henrik Enberg
2002-09-10 20:40 ` Lute Kamstra
2002-09-10 19:05 ` Stefan Monnier <foo@acm.com>
2002-09-11 7:51 ` Adam
2002-09-11 8:21 ` Aurelio
2002-09-11 8:21 ` Aurelio
2002-09-11 8:34 ` Klaus Berndl
2002-09-11 10:35 ` Sacha Chua
2002-09-11 22:25 ` Jochen Küpper
2002-09-12 8:29 ` Klaus Berndl
2002-09-12 9:14 ` Zhongtao Zhu
2002-09-12 14:23 ` Jochen Küpper
2002-09-12 19:33 ` maierh
2002-09-12 15:51 ` D. Goel
2002-09-11 21:36 ` Rodney Sparapani
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2002-09-10 16:18 Aurelio
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
List information: https://www.gnu.org/software/emacs/
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=853bsf0x2d.fsf@lola.goethe.zz \
--to=dak@gnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).