From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: kai.grossjohann@uni-duisburg.de (Kai =?iso-8859-1?q?Gro=DFjohann?=) Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.help Subject: Re: PCL-CVS and recursive cvs-examine Date: Wed, 19 Feb 2003 11:42:42 +0100 Organization: University of Duisburg, Germany Sender: help-gnu-emacs-bounces+gnu-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Message-ID: <84u1f0wnz1.fsf@lucy.is.informatik.uni-duisburg.de> References: NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1045651687 7946 80.91.224.249 (19 Feb 2003 10:48:07 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 19 Feb 2003 10:48:07 +0000 (UTC) Return-path: Original-Received: from monty-python.gnu.org ([199.232.76.173]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 18lRll-00023y-00 for ; Wed, 19 Feb 2003 11:48:05 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.10.13) id 18lRji-0007xd-09 for gnu-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Wed, 19 Feb 2003 05:45:58 -0500 Original-Path: shelby.stanford.edu!newsfeed.stanford.edu!headwall.stanford.edu!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!pd951fe9a.dip.t-dialin.NET!not-for-mail Original-Newsgroups: gnu.emacs.help Original-Lines: 8 Original-NNTP-Posting-Host: pd951fe9a.dip.t-dialin.net (217.81.254.154) Original-X-Trace: fu-berlin.de 1045651424 50699840 217.81.254.154 (16 [73968]) User-Agent: Gnus/5.090016 (Oort Gnus v0.16) Emacs/21.3.50 Cancel-Lock: sha1:k8AAXGcTFU+4kmH6d2LG8LFS2SI= Original-Xref: shelby.stanford.edu gnu.emacs.help:110369 Original-To: help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org X-BeenThere: help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1b5 Precedence: list List-Id: Users list for the GNU Emacs text editor List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Archive: List-Unsubscribe: , Errors-To: help-gnu-emacs-bounces+gnu-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.help:6871 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.help:6871 Galen Boyer writes: > Can I do this or do I only examine each directory explicitly? Doesn't it work? Doing it on the top-level directory should do the right thing. But maybe you have to hit M-e instead of e? -- A turnip curses Elvis