From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.help Subject: Re: Emacs 29 slow subprocess output when using pipe for connection Date: Sun, 27 Aug 2023 11:55:22 +0300 Message-ID: <83sf84kgp1.fsf@gnu.org> References: <83ttskkhlm.fsf@gnu.org> Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="37505"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" To: help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Original-X-From: help-gnu-emacs-bounces+geh-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Sun Aug 27 10:56:47 2023 Return-path: Envelope-to: geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1qaBZf-0009X0-6s for geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Sun, 27 Aug 2023 10:56:47 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1qaBZ0-0004au-QT; Sun, 27 Aug 2023 04:56:06 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1qaBYy-0004P0-FU for help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 27 Aug 2023 04:56:04 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1qaBYy-0008Qd-5j for help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 27 Aug 2023 04:56:04 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnu.org; s=fencepost-gnu-org; h=References:Subject:In-Reply-To:To:From:Date: mime-version; bh=J9/FLNHWd7ulPJ6dj5UGfSHb4udbZbi1kkHQJzIo1nk=; b=XpjgmD4g/KAT QtwE3UA/cyCP/SNzGBi0D9BbN9B9bBNdSSPSrKytspyVN88osquocf4kWAsuUi1rFlhP2HeaGoJ0L PuxHtBlGHFpVegU7x+uKKBHy2xVYahh7YcD17TotV1v+YBcMWi5u85yeXSUHpDjN3rp9hVbK8DKpa kGbWnffYdBwL23ujSLpMxV1Sw/vQOCozCEwtA0JNSiHsSkA6nbzNw2RAkviluW5YAEtTE7nVauCM3 1H54aCdEY5Zr0T733CSTIrdeHRy+AgurQm1/QM362r+SREhPJT0giwco1jwIt9T5KEBKSLsKLDl5P 7rmgBhxxfbsqjP+csBCJ/w==; In-Reply-To: <83ttskkhlm.fsf@gnu.org> (message from Eli Zaretskii on Sun, 27 Aug 2023 11:35:49 +0300) X-BeenThere: help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Users list for the GNU Emacs text editor List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: help-gnu-emacs-bounces+geh-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: help-gnu-emacs-bounces+geh-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.help:144976 Archived-At: > Date: Sun, 27 Aug 2023 11:35:49 +0300 > From: Eli Zaretskii > > > Date: Fri, 25 Aug 2023 23:39:23 -0400 > > From: Chris Hanson > > > > On Emacs 29, I've noticed when using the MIT/GNU Scheme interaction mode > > (xscheme.el) the output is extremely slow; it was fine in Emacs 28. > > Please define "extremely slow" in more quantitative terms. E.g., can > you show a comparative benchmark between these two versions of Emacs, > so that the relative times could be assessed? And please also show the details of the Emacs configuration and build in both versions, so that their comparative performances could be assessed. The relevant variables are: . system-configuration . system-configuration-options . system-configuration-features I assume that you run both versions on the same system, or on systems with very similar hardware and software configurations. If not, please describe that as well.