From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.help Subject: Re: A question about face-all-attributes Date: Wed, 23 Oct 2013 18:42:46 +0300 Message-ID: <83ob6ghu2x.fsf@gnu.org> References: NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1382542974 24339 80.91.229.3 (23 Oct 2013 15:42:54 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 23 Oct 2013 15:42:54 +0000 (UTC) To: help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Original-X-From: help-gnu-emacs-bounces+geh-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Oct 23 17:42:58 2013 Return-path: Envelope-to: geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1VZ0aH-0003i4-8A for geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Wed, 23 Oct 2013 17:42:57 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:49874 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VZ0aG-0005wz-Rr for geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Wed, 23 Oct 2013 11:42:56 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:49020) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VZ0Zy-0005we-Aq for help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 23 Oct 2013 11:42:45 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VZ0Zr-0000Iu-0K for help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 23 Oct 2013 11:42:38 -0400 Original-Received: from mtaout20.012.net.il ([80.179.55.166]:38940) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VZ0Zq-0000Ij-OV for help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 23 Oct 2013 11:42:30 -0400 Original-Received: from conversion-daemon.a-mtaout20.012.net.il by a-mtaout20.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) id <0MV400100OUWXN00@a-mtaout20.012.net.il> for help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 23 Oct 2013 18:42:29 +0300 (IDT) Original-Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([87.69.4.28]) by a-mtaout20.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) with ESMTPA id <0MV40010COYSP870@a-mtaout20.012.net.il> for help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 23 Oct 2013 18:42:28 +0300 (IDT) In-reply-to: X-012-Sender: halo1@inter.net.il X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Solaris 10 X-Received-From: 80.179.55.166 X-BeenThere: help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: Users list for the GNU Emacs text editor List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: help-gnu-emacs-bounces+geh-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: help-gnu-emacs-bounces+geh-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.help:94175 Archived-At: > Date: Wed, 23 Oct 2013 21:49:28 +0800 > From: Xue Fuqiao > > (face-all-attributes 'default) > => > ((:family . unspecified) (:foundry . unspecified) (:width . > unspecified) (:height . unspecified) (:weight . unspecified) (:slant . > unspecified) (:underline . unspecified) (:overline . unspecified) > (:strike-through . unspecified) (:box . unspecified) (:inverse-video . > unspecified) (:foreground . unspecified) ...) > > But: > > (describe-face 'default) > => > Family: Ubuntu Mono > Foundry: unknown > Width: normal > Height: 128 > ... > > Why are the two results different? I expected similar results from > them. If the results were similar, the existence of describe-face would not have been justified. It exists to show you what the default attributes really will be.