From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>
To: help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org
Subject: Re: [Solved] RE: Differences between identical strings in Emacs lisp
Date: Wed, 08 Apr 2015 14:59:51 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <83egnuhlu0.fsf@gnu.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <DUB124-W33489FF54D2A924A11EBBAA8FC0@phx.gbl>
> From: Jürgen Hartmann <juergen_hartmann_@hotmail.com>
> Date: Wed, 8 Apr 2015 13:01:16 +0200
>
> >> [About mapping between unibyte and multibyte strings]
> >>
> >> First I thought that some hidden decoding based on some charsets or
> >> coding
> >> systems occurs.
> >
> > Actually, some sort of "decoding" does occur, albeit perhaps not in
> > the use cases you tried -- Emacs will sometimes silently convert
> > unibyte characters to their locale-dependent multibyte equivalents.
>
> On which occasion such a conversion is done?
One example that comes to mind is (insert 160), i.e. when inserting
text into a buffer. There are other examples, but I simply don't
remember them at the moment.
> Has this anything to do with the the charset that is individually
> defined in language-info-alist for nearly each language environment?
No, I think Emacs converts the value to the character that has the
same Unicode codepoint.
> It seems that all my related observations that puzzled me before can be well
> explained by the strict distinction between characters and raw bytes and the
> mapping between the latter's integer representations in the range
> [0x80..0xFF] in an unibyte context and in the range [0x3FFF80..0x3FFFFF] in a
> multibyte context.
Pretty much, yes.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-04-08 11:59 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <mailman.76.1428326518.904.help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org>
2015-04-07 0:10 ` Differences between identical strings in Emacs lisp Pascal J. Bourguignon
2015-04-07 13:55 ` [Solved] " Jürgen Hartmann
2015-04-07 14:22 ` Eli Zaretskii
2015-04-07 17:02 ` Jürgen Hartmann
2015-04-07 17:28 ` Eli Zaretskii
2015-04-08 11:01 ` Jürgen Hartmann
2015-04-08 11:59 ` Eli Zaretskii [this message]
2015-04-08 12:37 ` Stefan Monnier
2015-04-09 10:38 ` Jürgen Hartmann
2015-04-09 12:32 ` Stefan Monnier
2015-04-09 12:45 ` Eli Zaretskii
2015-04-10 2:35 ` Richard Wordingham
2015-04-10 4:46 ` Stefan Monnier
2015-04-10 12:24 ` Jürgen Hartmann
2015-04-09 10:36 ` Jürgen Hartmann
2015-04-07 18:24 ` Thien-Thi Nguyen
2015-04-09 10:40 ` Jürgen Hartmann
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
List information: https://www.gnu.org/software/emacs/
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=83egnuhlu0.fsf@gnu.org \
--to=eliz@gnu.org \
--cc=help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).