From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.help Subject: Re: Size and length limits for Emacs primitive types and etc data? Date: Tue, 05 Feb 2013 20:14:08 +0200 Message-ID: <83bobyaarz.fsf@gnu.org> References: <87sj5s50vn.fsf@gavenkoa.example.com> <8338xdb42f.fsf@gnu.org> <83r4kw9imv.fsf@gnu.org> <877gmnp064.fsf@gavenkoa.example.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1360088049 1138 80.91.229.3 (5 Feb 2013 18:14:09 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 5 Feb 2013 18:14:09 +0000 (UTC) To: help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Original-X-From: help-gnu-emacs-bounces+geh-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Feb 05 19:14:30 2013 Return-path: Envelope-to: geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1U2n2L-0000ND-5c for geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Tue, 05 Feb 2013 19:14:29 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:53643 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1U2n22-0004yX-5Z for geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Tue, 05 Feb 2013 13:14:10 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:45625) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1U2n1x-0004y8-0y for help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 05 Feb 2013 13:14:05 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1U2n1r-0008R9-5P for help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 05 Feb 2013 13:14:04 -0500 Original-Received: from mtaout21.012.net.il ([80.179.55.169]:52152) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1U2n1q-0008Qx-TS for help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 05 Feb 2013 13:13:59 -0500 Original-Received: from conversion-daemon.a-mtaout21.012.net.il by a-mtaout21.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) id <0MHR00F00EKQFL00@a-mtaout21.012.net.il> for help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 05 Feb 2013 20:13:57 +0200 (IST) Original-Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([87.69.4.28]) by a-mtaout21.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) with ESMTPA id <0MHR00FDCEN87U90@a-mtaout21.012.net.il> for help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 05 Feb 2013 20:13:57 +0200 (IST) In-reply-to: <877gmnp064.fsf@gavenkoa.example.com> X-012-Sender: halo1@inter.net.il X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Solaris 10 X-Received-From: 80.179.55.169 X-BeenThere: help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: Users list for the GNU Emacs text editor List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: help-gnu-emacs-bounces+geh-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: help-gnu-emacs-bounces+geh-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.help:88966 Archived-At: > From: Oleksandr Gavenko > Date: Tue, 05 Feb 2013 11:41:55 +0200 > > In my original post I can't analyse how many memory take hash tables... Depends on the size of the table, obviously. > And also it is interesting to know how much key-value pairs can hold hash > table. most-positive-fixnum, I guess. (Why is that interesting?) > I think linked nature of elisp data structure cause very high rate of CPU > cache miss (but I don't actually run any AMD/Intel CPU profilers). Prove it.