From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.help Subject: Re: Is Elisp really that slow? Date: Fri, 17 May 2019 16:31:22 +0300 Message-ID: <8336ldb42d.fsf@gnu.org> References: <20190516161408.4dov3dwk5h4yoizn@Ergus> <838sv6cmwt.fsf@gnu.org> <20190516202327.5cgy2s4kppy3ahxa@Ergus> <871s0yqg2i.fsf@telefonica.net> <3210C8E9-7A74-47D6-81A0-470948E6D09C@gmail.com> <87r28xq0j1.fsf@telefonica.net> <576240a5-c92a-5cf8-898b-43f214a2b580@yandex.ru> <83imu9beyn.fsf@gnu.org> <8463581c-c40f-a66a-5c9c-0995a3b45cd0@yandex.ru> <83bm01b83i.fsf@gnu.org> <20190517125657.og5cpc5ty7mjdyhw@Ergus> Injection-Info: blaine.gmane.org; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:195.159.176.226"; logging-data="1985"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@blaine.gmane.org" To: help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Original-X-From: help-gnu-emacs-bounces+geh-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri May 17 15:31:59 2019 Return-path: Envelope-to: geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1hRcxr-0000NR-0Y for geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Fri, 17 May 2019 15:31:59 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:48704 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hRcxp-0006e5-Sk for geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Fri, 17 May 2019 09:31:57 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:60167) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hRcxY-0006bu-3l for help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 17 May 2019 09:31:40 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:54369) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hRcxY-0008M3-0a for help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 17 May 2019 09:31:40 -0400 Original-Received: from [176.228.60.248] (port=3381 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1hRcxV-0000be-Sd for help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 17 May 2019 09:31:39 -0400 In-reply-to: <20190517125657.og5cpc5ty7mjdyhw@Ergus> (message from Ergus on Fri, 17 May 2019 14:56:57 +0200) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-BeenThere: help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: Users list for the GNU Emacs text editor List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: help-gnu-emacs-bounces+geh-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "help-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.help:120477 Archived-At: > Date: Fri, 17 May 2019 14:56:57 +0200 > From: Ergus > Cc: help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org > > Sorry for starting this, this is exactly the kind of discussions I try > to avoid at any price because at the end there are a lot of emails that > finally solve nothing because there is never an agreement. It is up to us whether this discussion will lead somewhere constructive. > I just mentioned AN EXAMPLE. So please, as none of these issues will be > solved If this is just a single example, then yes, we should probably forget about it. OTOH, if there are many such examples, we should not forget. Inconsistency in keybindings is baaad, mkay? But a single inconsistent binding, or a small number of them, are not yet a problem that needs our attention.