From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.help Subject: Re: Large text files - no line numbers ? Date: Thu, 05 Dec 2019 18:40:57 +0200 Message-ID: <831rtiiv3a.fsf@gnu.org> References: <20191204094704.26e32c9e@mistral> <831rtkjef8.fsf@gnu.org> <20191205094421.6bfc46e7@mistral> <838snqiypc.fsf@gnu.org> <20191205104611.07377f8c@mistral> Injection-Info: blaine.gmane.org; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:195.159.176.226"; logging-data="238330"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@blaine.gmane.org" To: help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Original-X-From: help-gnu-emacs-bounces+geh-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Dec 05 17:41:40 2019 Return-path: Envelope-to: geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1icuCA-000zof-8r for geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Thu, 05 Dec 2019 17:41:38 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:57400 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1icuC8-0007mM-TD for geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Thu, 05 Dec 2019 11:41:36 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:60632) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1icuBY-0007lr-Vm for help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 05 Dec 2019 11:41:01 -0500 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:42751) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1icuBY-0003mn-Kk for help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 05 Dec 2019 11:41:00 -0500 Original-Received: from [176.228.60.248] (port=1484 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1icuBX-0007Gj-VD for help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 05 Dec 2019 11:41:00 -0500 In-reply-to: <20191205104611.07377f8c@mistral> (message from jonetsu on Thu, 5 Dec 2019 10:46:11 -0500) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-BeenThere: help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: Users list for the GNU Emacs text editor List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: help-gnu-emacs-bounces+geh-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "help-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.help:122017 Archived-At: > Date: Thu, 5 Dec 2019 10:46:11 -0500 > From: jonetsu > > Unaffected means that whereas putting 1000 in > line-number-display-limit-width has solved the 'L??' by making it > display actual line numbers, the bookmark functionality behaves wrongly > as it will not jump to a bookmark, but somewhere else in the file. As > it did before updating the line-number-display-limit-width value. > > It behaves wrongly in the sense that since line numbers are now > displayed correctly, it could be right to assume that the bookmarks > will now work as intended (they did not when L?? was displayed) - but > they do not. AFAIK, there's no relation whatsoever between the line-number display in the mode line and bookmarks. > > How is this related to bookmarks? > > By assuming that the L?? display also prevented the bookmark > feature from functioning correctly. It doesn't, AFAICT.