From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.help Subject: Re: [External] : Re: Native compilation Date: Mon, 10 Jan 2022 19:51:53 +0200 Message-ID: <831r1fa37q.fsf@gnu.org> References: <875yr5up38.fsf@zoho.eu> <83k0flge7s.fsf@gnu.org> <87tuept0qc.fsf@zoho.eu> <83ee5tgcwv.fsf@gnu.org> <87ilv5sz9s.fsf@zoho.eu> <834k6ohp2o.fsf@gnu.org> <87ilutv5sb.fsf@zoho.eu> <83czl12xgd.fsf@gnu.org> <87tuebsp1b.fsf@zoho.eu> Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="33899"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" To: help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Original-X-From: help-gnu-emacs-bounces+geh-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Mon Jan 10 19:01:00 2022 Return-path: Envelope-to: geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1n6yyZ-0008aN-N3 for geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Mon, 10 Jan 2022 19:00:59 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:35714 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1n6yyY-0001Au-AH for geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Mon, 10 Jan 2022 13:00:58 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:48456) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1n6ypx-0007ag-DQ for help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 10 Jan 2022 12:52:05 -0500 Original-Received: from [2001:470:142:3::e] (port=52378 helo=fencepost.gnu.org) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1n6ypx-0006Gn-3o for help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 10 Jan 2022 12:52:05 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnu.org; s=fencepost-gnu-org; h=References:Subject:In-Reply-To:To:From:Date: mime-version; bh=4Gj2VLkqeS0U3HtjN85wdgUcZjygKIZiam/Ra+GSzf8=; b=hhzX3yLP9DTe Msk/Q2sMiQQuyyr2CedLmIf3HSqcBa02sNb0NRTKumCoGRV6+NSwFmJaHlNxz8AyyRqmpuNgM7yRv JlAbqd8PIyMEqlztOMIYLMTs+k8D/0TUuKTLS54jFA6SNZQVsrggIo425HT4gMQkqwY1x52qPYTHQ OmFq2J8AUDUDG7aTH1xMBGZxS6J6t6ykkrcIu/T/wTuQDpVY9StYq6EKlfg9gILY53ZHD9ymRs26D 5wm0KlUpYKbnwHL8YPKUmfxLGxmrhklU7h7/bkjM2aZcCyzsN/IGP/dNz0JsQONCasHTHYR3cCouK jgCP6Oc9Co/E+X9fK6vGfw==; Original-Received: from [87.69.77.57] (port=4234 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1n6ypw-0004C4-24 for help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 10 Jan 2022 12:52:05 -0500 In-Reply-To: <87tuebsp1b.fsf@zoho.eu> (message from Emanuel Berg via Users list for the GNU Emacs text editor on Mon, 10 Jan 2022 14:23:12 +0100) X-BeenThere: help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Users list for the GNU Emacs text editor List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: help-gnu-emacs-bounces+geh-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "help-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.help:135188 Archived-At: > Date: Mon, 10 Jan 2022 14:23:12 +0100 > From: Emanuel Berg via Users list for the GNU Emacs text editor > > Eli Zaretskii wrote: > > >>>> Here is what it said during the native compile: > >>>> > >>>> Warning (comp): Cannot look-up eln file as no source file > >>>> was found for /home/incal/.emacs.elc > >>> > >>> The former means your .emacs was not natively compiled > >>> (which is generally a Good Thing). > >> > >> Thanks, you mean not to compile it natively or not compile > >> it at all? > > > > Natively. > > Okay, it is interesting that you say so because didn't you > use (?) to say that byte-compiling of the .emacs and > supplemental files was disencouraged? I did, but how is that relevant to the issue at hand? > Why is it that while it makes sense to natively byte-compile > the Elisp of GNU Emacs it doesn't make sense to natively > byte-compile all other Elisp? Because the gains will be null and void. > But OK, just byte-compiling the old what, that doesn't make it > natively byte-compiled, right? No. > That happens automatically when Emacs is run, after being > configured --with-native-compilation [1], and it only affects > GNU Emacs Elisp, right? What is "that" in this case? > Or what about [M]ELPA Elisp, that natively byte-compiled > as well? What do you mean by "MELPA Elisp"? > If so, even more so, then why not all Elisp? Why not what?