From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Jambunathan K Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.help Subject: Re: re-loading an elisp file Date: Fri, 25 Mar 2011 14:15:54 +0530 Message-ID: <81vcz7h9kt.fsf@gmail.com> References: <87bp1ptwn6.fsf@kuiper.lan.informatimago.com> <87r5alb4b2.fsf@rapttech.com.au> <87aagjaelq.fsf@puma.rapttech.com.au> <87ipv73d6t.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1301064151 15916 80.91.229.12 (25 Mar 2011 14:42:31 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 25 Mar 2011 14:42:31 +0000 (UTC) To: help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Original-X-From: help-gnu-emacs-bounces+geh-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Mar 25 15:42:26 2011 Return-path: Envelope-to: geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Q38Da-0001h1-Ae for geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Fri, 25 Mar 2011 15:42:26 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:39426 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Q38DX-0000b1-C3 for geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Fri, 25 Mar 2011 10:42:23 -0400 Original-Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=57152 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Q32es-0006UQ-IT for help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 25 Mar 2011 04:46:15 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Q32eq-0005t0-R7 for help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 25 Mar 2011 04:46:13 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-iy0-f169.google.com ([209.85.210.169]:48232) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Q32eq-0005sw-MP for help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 25 Mar 2011 04:46:12 -0400 Original-Received: by iyf13 with SMTP id 13so1069250iyf.0 for ; Fri, 25 Mar 2011 01:46:12 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:from:to:cc:subject:references:date:in-reply-to :message-id:user-agent:mime-version:content-type; bh=HDBeBdKwWHe8clg3VbA+OR9xlO7iFdWpx9s1Sp0dT+g=; b=VHazQ6weNOxLK0ceFJhqoqSb9V6o+O6uI/RhGTvL/gtRUR7vSETbjShJX6b6ouFrVu w6oqc/MwGtaxH0f4UhC1N8AbgdWhTa3BZ5xElcBd3U50QRUYC0bfWIZw5QX6MujxgyUB In3GMepWRnameqaRidB86A0H6R1KWN9+O7gpo= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=from:to:cc:subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id :user-agent:mime-version:content-type; b=AonwuKSsbuw3GxbkxF8zscElW5/khj7x66SIykmNypRPzmEP9bFNwydc38nT53Zc9d zSs8/VBO7vq6UxzIulkuelg+jjs9fxDw17rd/j5Wv8tJ8broFd59sImGCT6ptVSRviqZ stxs2x0Wm36Lpf4PgSuVvv2wimBQwqaj0WDdo= Original-Received: by 10.42.76.71 with SMTP id d7mr919316ick.109.1301042771905; Fri, 25 Mar 2011 01:46:11 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: from JAMBU-NETBOOK ([115.242.158.251]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id mv26sm522145ibb.28.2011.03.25.01.46.08 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Fri, 25 Mar 2011 01:46:11 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <87ipv73d6t.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org> (David Kastrup's message of "Fri, 25 Mar 2011 07:51:38 +0100") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.0.50 (windows-nt) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 2) X-Received-From: 209.85.210.169 X-Mailman-Approved-At: Fri, 25 Mar 2011 10:42:03 -0400 X-BeenThere: help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Users list for the GNU Emacs text editor List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: help-gnu-emacs-bounces+geh-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: help-gnu-emacs-bounces+geh-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.help:80425 Archived-At: > I prefer to read and respond to more messages than waste time > editing/correcting when dealing with an informal forum like usernet > and when the errors rarely affect the point being discussed. Right from this thread, you would have noted that errors affect (some) readers. Puts these fact together and decide what makes most sense to you. 1. Every reader is a potential respondent. 2. You have no prior knowledge of what would prevent a reader from responding. 3. You have raised a question with some hope that someone out there would respond. ps: Some people pride themselves of their high typing speeds while few others pride themselves of their impeccable English. Jambunathan K. --