unofficial mirror of help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Thien-Thi Nguyen <ttn@glug.org>
Subject: Re: C-x C-f in two frames -> "user minibuffer while in
Date: Thu, 07 Jul 2005 10:57:08 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <7eoe9f2duj.fsf@ada2.unipv.it> (raw)
In-Reply-To: u1x6brsi6.fsf@comcast.net

don provan <dprovan@comcast.net> writes:

> Has anyone come up with any ways the recursive commands could be
> better, or is it pretty much accepted that there's nothing that could
> be done to improve them?

one idea is to modify `mode-line-format' to indicate presence, level,
or stack contents, of recursion.

  presence:       R
  level:          RRR   (or maybe R3)
  stack contents: (find-file find-file find-file)

alternatively, borrow something from the recursive editing indicator
(normally square braces around the major and minor mode info).

nothing is univerally "pretty much accepted" (except death and taxes,
but i hear emacs and the fsf avoid these, respectively, somehow :-).

thi

  reply	other threads:[~2005-07-07  8:57 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2005-06-08 13:18 C-x C-f in two frames -> "user minibuffer while in minibuffer": Bug? David Reitter
2005-06-08 14:08 ` Peter Dyballa
     [not found] ` <mailman.3863.1118240186.25862.help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org>
2005-06-08 14:55   ` C-x C-f in two frames -> "user minibuffer while in Toto
2005-07-03 21:47     ` David Combs
2005-07-04  0:15       ` Miles Bader
     [not found]       ` <mailman.2058.1120436940.2857.help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org>
2005-07-04  7:52         ` don provan
2005-07-05 22:27           ` Miles Bader
     [not found]           ` <mailman.2259.1120602813.2857.help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org>
2005-07-07  7:21             ` don provan
2005-07-07  8:57               ` Thien-Thi Nguyen [this message]
2005-07-07 15:10                 ` Drew Adams
2005-07-04  8:23         ` David Kastrup
2005-06-09 16:22 ` C-x C-f in two frames -> "user minibuffer while in minibuffer": Bug? Drew Adams
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2005-07-04 10:01 C-x C-f in two frames -> "user minibuffer while in LENNART BORGMAN
     [not found] <mailman.2091.1120471829.2857.help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org>
2005-07-05  7:12 ` don provan

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

  List information: https://www.gnu.org/software/emacs/

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=7eoe9f2duj.fsf@ada2.unipv.it \
    --to=ttn@glug.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).