From: Marco Antoniotti <marcoxa@cs.nyu.edu>
Subject: Re: Differences between Elisp and Lisp
Date: Tue, 29 Apr 2003 10:23:01 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <7Vvra.15$aX1.3111@typhoon.nyu.edu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <mailman.5343.1051607007.21513.help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org>
Johan Bockgård wrote:
> From gnu.emacs.help, followup-to set to gnu.emacs.help
>
> "Daniel R. Anderson" writes:
>
>
> >On emacswiki.org there is a "wish list". Quite a few people want
> >emacs to be based on another version of LISP. Out of curiosity, what
> >is it that makes elisp inherently bad, or why would people want it
> >to be changed?
I'll skip the first one. For the second I'd wager that people *know*
that Common Lisp is the right answer and people would love to see RMS
admit that he messed up royally by promoting Guile :)
Cheers
--
Marco Antoniotti
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2003-04-29 14:23 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <mailman.5343.1051607007.21513.help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org>
2003-04-29 10:22 ` Differences between Elisp and Lisp Friedrich Dominicus
2003-04-29 10:27 ` Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen
2003-04-29 10:35 ` David Kastrup
2003-04-29 11:03 ` Oliver Scholz
2003-04-29 12:23 ` Phillip Lord
2003-04-29 14:17 ` Thomas Link
2003-04-29 15:43 ` Kent M Pitman
2003-04-29 15:56 ` Phillip Lord
2003-04-29 16:44 ` Kent M Pitman
2003-04-29 17:16 ` Phillip Lord
2003-04-29 18:41 ` Kai Großjohann
2003-04-30 12:39 ` Phillip Lord
2003-04-30 13:12 ` Kai Großjohann
2003-04-30 18:07 ` Kevin Rodgers
2003-04-29 18:59 ` Oliver Scholz
2003-04-30 12:43 ` Phillip Lord
2003-04-29 17:01 ` Kai Großjohann
2003-04-30 23:02 ` Stefan Monnier
2003-05-01 5:22 ` Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen
2003-05-01 5:41 ` Friedrich Dominicus
2003-05-01 5:54 ` Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen
2003-05-01 6:37 ` [OT] " Friedrich Dominicus
[not found] ` <yoijznm9y5yr.fsf@bilbo.dd.chalmers.se>
2003-04-29 13:45 ` Kent M Pitman
2003-04-29 15:23 ` Nicolas Neuss
2003-04-29 15:28 ` Nicolas Neuss
2003-04-29 14:23 ` Marco Antoniotti [this message]
2003-04-29 14:29 ` Phillip Lord
2003-04-29 19:06 ` Oliver Scholz
2003-04-29 16:51 ` Kaz Kylheku
2003-04-29 8:57 Daniel R. Anderson
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
List information: https://www.gnu.org/software/emacs/
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='7Vvra.15$aX1.3111@typhoon.nyu.edu' \
--to=marcoxa@cs.nyu.edu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).