From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: rameiko87@posteo.net Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.help Subject: Re: smtpmail-send-queued-mail fails with error 504 5.5.2 Date: Wed, 24 Jan 2024 14:26:17 +0000 Message-ID: <6ac9ec028ebd233b07cc1d471493d2bb@posteo.net> References: <84782f317f0c10702277723d9e50449b@posteo.net> <87bk9dmqr0.fsf@ledu-giraud.fr> <3aea55e22ae89089d27ced95236956e3@posteo.net> <87y1cfrtf9.fsf@ledu-giraud.fr> <0808c961e67ac0a8e0295f7cf123755f@posteo.net> <87mssu995r.fsf@ledu-giraud.fr> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="5824"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org To: Manuel Giraud Original-X-From: help-gnu-emacs-bounces+geh-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Wed Jan 24 15:27:03 2024 Return-path: Envelope-to: geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1rSeDW-0001KY-W2 for geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Wed, 24 Jan 2024 15:27:03 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1rSeCv-0000G0-B0; Wed, 24 Jan 2024 09:26:25 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1rSeCt-0000Fa-77 for help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 24 Jan 2024 09:26:23 -0500 Original-Received: from mout01.posteo.de ([185.67.36.65]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1rSeCq-0003Ge-LV for help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 24 Jan 2024 09:26:22 -0500 Original-Received: from submission (posteo.de [185.67.36.169]) by mout01.posteo.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 879BD240029 for ; Wed, 24 Jan 2024 15:26:17 +0100 (CET) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=posteo.net; s=2017; t=1706106377; bh=VR+v7TEp7QDxKalnpGM+2fofbBhZRXWxHdvW75BdXHs=; h=MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Date:From:To: Cc:Subject:Message-ID:From; b=jj3OVIO68JAw6SQUaKhqu3AcxggagWy4RaOocKZQ2u1ieep13ml4MxmUPkxsslfrF QEpUgzZESJ7+qSFwXMelQsvBQZzaYz0YPw6uk80276LBnVMz11Ai8+JY0TNrQCWTYx htjaCexG2wDp6H+P58YLVo5Ga8uTchaNzNCXktIV2uCunaCSerPz41G9b+pZ2O3ZUn Apy8RRNQa62O061FnwEZULIjdjwefGF7XZlR01b+UiuXH+DSFnC4zSjeSWNBUEzUcs 6rqwN8nIl1z3/6O9k3GTxCHGMRDsM/r0hvDiSqTFvkUW3pOEAZgNB6nKrIMKr0FDza gPP0skgMIJ5Rw== Original-Received: from customer (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by submission (posteo.de) with ESMTPSA id 4TKmV11z1Mz6txc; Wed, 24 Jan 2024 15:26:17 +0100 (CET) In-Reply-To: <87mssu995r.fsf@ledu-giraud.fr> Received-SPF: pass client-ip=185.67.36.65; envelope-from=rameiko87@posteo.net; helo=mout01.posteo.de X-Spam_score_int: -43 X-Spam_score: -4.4 X-Spam_bar: ---- X-Spam_report: (-4.4 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H5=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Users list for the GNU Emacs text editor List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: help-gnu-emacs-bounces+geh-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: help-gnu-emacs-bounces+geh-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.help:145796 Archived-At: >> which should instead only be reserved for message-id's (as the >> description of this variable says. Does it happen somewhere else too? >> this is the second thing to fix). > > How to fix something that we don't know about? Is there any way to check where the variable message-user-fqdn is being used? Also, I understand from your messages that when message-user-fqdn is nil then the Message-ID's are built with domain set to the value of the domain in user-mail-address, no matter whether this is a valid address or not. In the preceding sentence, by domain I mean everything to the right of the at-sign. Is this correct? When I set message-user-fqdn instead, are the Message-ID's always built by using the message-user-fqdn regardless of the value of user-mail-address? And then when message-user-fqdn is nil and user-mail-address is the default (that is user@fedora), then does Message Mode attempt sending to this invalid email address and shows an error, or does it modify the To: to some valid email address?