unofficial mirror of help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Xah <xahlee@gmail.com>
To: help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org
Subject: Re: Half-QWERTY keyboard minor mode
Date: Sat, 4 Oct 2008 14:47:08 -0700 (PDT)	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <6952e93a-e5fd-4970-a6e2-a05518fbfd00@p31g2000prf.googlegroups.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: mailman.20155.1222699482.18990.help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org

Corey Foote wrote:
«For details on the half-QWERTY keyboard see:http://www.billbuxton.com/
matiasHCI96.html#c2»

half-QWERTY seems ill conceived.

If you check the author, it's his university thesis and the design
Patented in US and Europe by his own company.

It compares something he cooked up “half-dvorak” and chalk it up to
use in single handed typing devices in wearable computer.

For comparison, on standard keyboard, if you only have one hand,
there's already Single handed Dvorak, one version for left and and one
version for right hand.
See http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dvorak_Simplified_Keyboard

So, if you are handicapp'd and can only use one hand to type on
standard PC keyboard, single handed Dvorak would probably be much more
efficient. (the article don't mention it)

Now, if one is thinking of keyboard input devices that must be
designed for single hand use, as stated in the article, such as some
future vision of wearable computer on the forearm, then there's no
good reason to limit the physical design of such input device to
something like cutting up existing to half of standard PC keyboard.
There are, for example, numberous design of chorded input devices for
single hand that are actually in use.

As for ease of transition of learning, as cited in the article as a
major reason... there are lots problems. For example, first of all,
majority of people who use a PC keyboard do not touch type. So, he's
presumed ease of transition is useless. Even, suppose we limit the
subjects to people who already touch type qwerty, then, learning the
half-QWERTY is not necessarily faster than learning a single hand
dvorak. (the simply doesn't mention single hand dvorak)

...

  Xah
∑ http://xahlee.org/

  parent reply	other threads:[~2008-10-04 21:47 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <mailman.20155.1222699482.18990.help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org>
2008-09-29 16:30 ` Half-QWERTY keyboard minor mode weber
2008-09-29 17:02   ` Corey Foote
     [not found]     ` <2f1c7d020809291153r2c7f1018o80bb8d8e30b7c085@mail.gmail.com>
2008-09-29 19:17       ` Corey Foote
2008-10-03  2:24         ` Kevin Rodgers
2008-10-04 21:47 ` Xah [this message]
2008-09-29 14:44 Corey Foote
2008-09-29 17:35 ` Corey Foote
2008-09-29 20:22   ` Paul R

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

  List information: https://www.gnu.org/software/emacs/

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=6952e93a-e5fd-4970-a6e2-a05518fbfd00@p31g2000prf.googlegroups.com \
    --to=xahlee@gmail.com \
    --cc=help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).