From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: =?UTF-8?B?QW5kcmVhcyBSw7ZobGVy?= Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.help Subject: Re: `looking-back' strange warning Date: Thu, 01 Oct 2015 20:24:40 +0200 Message-ID: <560D7A68.8040404@easy-emacs.de> References: <560B9C7F.2060301@easy-emacs.de> <560CD7CE.4010404@yandex.ru> <6524c81a-949c-40d1-b990-d214d6ee5b60@default> <560D73DF.8040403@yandex.ru> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1443726020 24969 80.91.229.3 (1 Oct 2015 19:00:20 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 1 Oct 2015 19:00:20 +0000 (UTC) To: Dmitry Gutov , Drew Adams , help-gnu-emacs , Tassilo Horn Original-X-From: help-gnu-emacs-bounces+geh-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Oct 01 21:00:13 2015 Return-path: Envelope-to: geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Zhj5P-0000p5-RG for geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Thu, 01 Oct 2015 21:00:11 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:55413 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Zhj5P-0006jG-8n for geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Thu, 01 Oct 2015 15:00:11 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:33481) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZhiXR-0002fF-3e for help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 01 Oct 2015 14:25:05 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZhiXP-0001t5-SB for help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 01 Oct 2015 14:25:05 -0400 Original-Received: from mout.kundenserver.de ([212.227.126.130]:55226) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZhiXI-0001hz-US; Thu, 01 Oct 2015 14:24:57 -0400 Original-Received: from [192.168.178.31] ([77.12.88.20]) by mrelayeu.kundenserver.de (mreue004) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 0MGVBU-1Zurfr2sYi-00DKeG; Thu, 01 Oct 2015 20:24:55 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.4.0 In-Reply-To: <560D73DF.8040403@yandex.ru> X-Provags-ID: V03:K0:RAsHKEcj1t7CczIU/ORGSp7SeAl1QDVnF6c/DEEBPPHK95qSMOK ryDQkXutqPZyqmx0t8gnFP67GgZ6KctDpyWauQ2yFwKzPoqlQtJ90Ie/ApAVNBNBGjLXCqd 44/n+burdjHMdUHQkbsE0hZ2H+Zq1lDV/QPE++UKOUJ3pwBR7BDua8zJiGTTRSyaDll291R 8yJvgrZs5XIMzvxkhQYHw== X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1;V01:K0:V3YTpsFwvzE=:xZL2Kp+ADTUj4Nfd/jy4F7 17lO/8UO0ZU0dZ1Aa1zRQbTnSmY0M379+NH2WWosR+CtPSAR5Pqz6GKiBJa6AhZXW21IgILwo 7cUw+jdBLP1Ie8PyZQOWbKYyOdTTDz/fsC6j5aNqHanmimn1y8UlnN7R2NF3jG+mHaSLjhIPR mylWr++2aw6KIEMGswI2H34Cw5g3iFd08e/s123XS2duRTJRdhR9PqJCwVv3RyjOLvP53bLYx oUxyLoeNOZ3yp3AxH/TLdIdJspirMSBb9lz0+Uhbbg/RZdTsbUrgWRmbdNgeQRoOjSSC42Yo3 EY/X378sarssAPLhR2PqLyKk3w9iDU+3G2eDQS6Xd0Up9ceJJ2oX7Lz1sOZB8wybfihq/AGPU /9HMei8o+rLRnahSu2dq9F1jCxqwWU8rvKIyHCDD71ASPRowYGHrWSlMM+gttxvlFAg2sD+s9 WpYZtMP9BvZ6vPCuZVmNveUtphfejny2xuhj5M3gbiyuXafcLV2iaI/LsGsR6Ip5lnbz1qIwv HuB3+Y7INe1Z/FR9NyZb7LLweuZApOfNcAY1xI53KjGkMGp9jOCCuZmDTX0zUTKvVTaw2L2fk b9o8OJj9MQsO5Ei48h1DZvlMMyA7PCFqDEsD6dImXkTAKqVuQnzb8R3aXRRXDOlaS4+t0vB1U YMbcILi3aqmi8ZmxXOxTv+2F68pklTbtMHc3eY1YjXtgyozfC5Nb69MA+z7/lhVqd8qJs3wGi QAcS4F5lmBox3h/73kChmraOrY45qCSC+mx2WKhcnocevLQJTQwQda+EEC3DVreZsRoRPjRB X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 212.227.126.130 X-BeenThere: help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: Users list for the GNU Emacs text editor List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: help-gnu-emacs-bounces+geh-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: help-gnu-emacs-bounces+geh-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.help:107432 Archived-At: Am 01.10.2015 um 19:56 schrieb Dmitry Gutov: > On 10/01/2015 07:00 PM, Drew Adams wrote: > >> Letting you know how to improve performance or avoid slow performance >> is helpful information, but it is not a "warning" - there is no >> danger here. And there is only one required argument. > > It's the first step toward making the LIMIT argument non-optional. > It's a wrong warning message - and a really bad style WRT users. BTW the intendet use case doesn't exist - as Tassilo found out. Backward move is slow - a limit doesn't change that, while the intendet change would provide a burden for the programmer. Beside the change would break a lot of code.