From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: =?UTF-8?B?QW5kcmVhcyBSw7ZobGVy?= Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.help Subject: Re: Defining functions on the fly Date: Tue, 16 Jun 2015 17:46:47 +0200 Message-ID: <558044E7.90104@easy-emacs.de> References: <557E99BE.2060407@easy-emacs.de> <557FBB3C.8060208@easy-emacs.de> <87lhfkjfvr.fsf@gnu.org> <557FEACC.3030101@easy-emacs.de> <87k2v3rjnv.fsf@gnu.org> <55800B18.3040208@easy-emacs.de> <87bngfre80.fsf@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1434469707 10781 80.91.229.3 (16 Jun 2015 15:48:27 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 16 Jun 2015 15:48:27 +0000 (UTC) To: help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Original-X-From: help-gnu-emacs-bounces+geh-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Jun 16 17:48:19 2015 Return-path: Envelope-to: geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Z4t54-00037E-TK for geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Tue, 16 Jun 2015 17:47:19 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:41051 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Z4t54-0005s5-G5 for geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Tue, 16 Jun 2015 11:47:18 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:39688) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Z4t4s-0005qv-HM for help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 16 Jun 2015 11:47:07 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Z4t4o-0007J0-Hm for help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 16 Jun 2015 11:47:06 -0400 Original-Received: from mout.kundenserver.de ([212.227.126.130]:50069) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Z4t4o-0007IT-0s for help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 16 Jun 2015 11:47:02 -0400 Original-Received: from [192.168.178.31] ([95.119.63.133]) by mrelayeu.kundenserver.de (mreue002) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 0MFUkm-1ZJEXI34Pk-00EPY6 for ; Tue, 16 Jun 2015 17:47:00 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.4.0 In-Reply-To: <87bngfre80.fsf@gnu.org> X-Provags-ID: V03:K0:wUrwDBBhdqc+nSAJz5tVoSFOMuKsfwa5dRxzNhLr0P0Qsbl0G5A HrUcLWt09mh3DI2xAgStku0S+YIiwXLmlWqYamFrhWdrYeXSRUrJuwNy0uBS3nWRbYV7I5+ MKybQa7qbvYdCXmFVPJiBUA0dW1Lim8VovPKv9ytwaHoXpVoPfqadpZa7lVpOOm3JsukA46 gIwoR1u5C/JWp1KeXY36w== X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1;V01:K0:mM/F8bvPGho=:x/KQgTfBlwpJCZhKz0ejGb AGLE8BdtS7AMGwm+gN8P5E9BQgkU2/kJ5FJAktT1ZHtTUPr/acArsj2+ml7wzntSRyjebCIyG IuLQzD75FnXlLbdXk3YRHdmLYGu3enP/10cghkXGRm5/e+2hc+SY221koRuCar/CBwtFlsVyQ g6uYx+ED3qFvSN/mX22Y62VT8eCAyARBoEyhz1FzjjeEjbGd26IRT5Q9hr/Gek5uwdXzL1rQ0 xeWez6768jnGJ7Q6yDD7JxEQxDTqmFoUKYO/f/42/zFi85z76m+wAC9qw19xNZNpAvibuMQOb ez+EiDx5+cQSskqeTBpLJRmaou5CXsOIVFS/XkLSOsK0BhDn6QmAR5U6qwNwEtR/M2Upp8hlL YsfPU2Pjitvy7FemM8Hte7kE43jWuPcmfjXDF+0481+3C3/Q84R4PWbzWOWnReAt/R1dIIx3G jMH1/mat02649LTy2IWVWrNJbsy1sCcpwllQ2GJvVvMEKKSIJDGin6N10o27tJXi4os4NrbOY 7AgqiAxRjeq4LEqErG6HDk/RrwdnLc2LwRAxN1dqHjcQaRWHXf3Uc11o3sL56w324K8jEDGLT jKcGzSfl/+xqma9sUrqkyRziqjxKtOOt+iXgitcxlx1SSpr9z5GTLAIcmBhbfYSqVAr9B24Ah iH0aMsKALubfkQcT/+JRKaL0bYywAQkDEhv/Z334QPLMrt0wt/VzLv4hh/zczPRQ9ZuX971lY 2ir/MsTVHVvz7NvbDYMnF2BLK/eC+Ogkw9AQZlv1MuxAUVNPvRb4QvLr2v0= X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 212.227.126.130 X-BeenThere: help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: Users list for the GNU Emacs text editor List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: help-gnu-emacs-bounces+geh-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: help-gnu-emacs-bounces+geh-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.help:104981 Archived-At: Am 16.06.2015 um 15:10 schrieb Tassilo Horn: > Andreas Röhler writes: > >>> No. `do ... done' is no valid expression, i.e., it cannot stand on >>> its own but is only valid together with for, while, until, or repeat. >> It's not the point to care for that. > Well, when you say you want to move by expression or statement then it > seems legit to do exactly that and not move by half of a statement. > >> It's about editing, reading, understanding the source. > I can understand that moving to the do wouldn't be bad with respect to > editing because it's nearer, e.g., two smaller steps might be better > than one large step which might already be too much. But the same time > you argue that `forward-sexp' in a string should jump to its end instead > of moving word-wise in its contents first. Because forward-word is implemented already and forward-sexp is redundant in this circumstances, while goto-end/start of string is missing. [ ... ]