From: Tariq <tariq.perwez@gmail.com>
To: help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org
Subject: Re: How to get xetex/xelatex option in the Emacs menu?
Date: Fri, 23 Apr 2010 12:04:23 -0700 (PDT) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <52ac7ffb-26b3-4d04-b722-3802190ca554@j17g2000yqa.googlegroups.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 87ljcem3jb.fsf@mithlond.arda
On Apr 23, 2:23 pm, Teemu Likonen <tliko...@iki.fi> wrote:
> * 2010-04-23 10:54 (-0700), Tariq wrote:
>
> > I would like to include in one of these menus (preferably under the
> > Command menu) the option to run xetex/xelatex also so that I can use
> > Emacs to compile XeLaTeX files.
>
> You could do it with hook:
>
> (add-hook 'LaTeX-mode-hook #'my-latex-mode-hook)
>
> (defun my-latex-mode-hook ()
> (add-to-list 'TeX-command-list
> '("XeLaTeX" "%`xelatex%(mode)%' %t" TeX-run-TeX nil t)))
>
> The following is a fancier version of the hook. It sets XeLaTeX the
> default compiler when it finds fontspec or mathspec package being loaded
> with \usepackage{}.
>
> (defun my-latex-mode-hook ()
> (add-to-list 'TeX-command-list
> '("XeLaTeX" "%`xelatex%(mode)%' %t" TeX-run-TeX nil t))
> (setq TeX-command-default
> (save-excursion
> (save-restriction
> (widen)
> (goto-char (point-min))
> (let ((re (concat "^\\s-*\\\\usepackage\\(?:\\[.*\\]\\)?"
> "{.*\\<\\(?:font\\|math\\)spec\\>.*}")))
> (if (re-search-forward re 3000 t)
> "XeLaTeX"
> "LaTeX"))))))
Thank you so much for the code for two hooks. Consider this my naivity
but I cannot tell the difference (if any) in the behaviour of Emacs
when using the first or the second (fancier) hook. Specifically, I see
the appearance of XeLaTeX under the Command menu after opening a .tex
file and this is the case with either code. Similarly, when I select
(in TeXing Options) PDF Mode, I still need to press XeLaTeX in Command
menu.
I got the impression from your description that with the fancier code,
the LaTeX option would execute XeLaTeX if the file has
\usepackage{fontspec} in it. this does not appear to be the case. Most
likely, I am confused about something. What specifically is the
difference in the expected behaviour of these two codes? I would
appreciate if you could elaborate. Regards,
Tariq
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-04-23 19:04 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-04-23 17:54 How to get xetex/xelatex option in the Emacs menu? Tariq
2010-04-23 18:23 ` Teemu Likonen
2010-04-23 19:04 ` Tariq [this message]
2010-04-23 19:45 ` Teemu Likonen
2010-04-23 20:13 ` Tariq
2010-04-23 19:11 ` Tariq
2010-04-23 21:32 ` Ralf Angeli
2010-04-23 21:40 ` Tariq
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
List information: https://www.gnu.org/software/emacs/
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=52ac7ffb-26b3-4d04-b722-3802190ca554@j17g2000yqa.googlegroups.com \
--to=tariq.perwez@gmail.com \
--cc=help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).