From: Xah Lee <xahlee@gmail.com>
To: help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org
Subject: Re: How to improve the readability of (any) LISP or any highlevel functional language to the level of FORTH ?
Date: Thu, 6 Jan 2011 21:36:22 -0800 (PST) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <519ccda4-c690-40f8-b59d-662b292e5bd2@o23g2000prh.googlegroups.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: veSdnaWbJ-7kB7nQnZ2dnUVZ7rOdnZ2d@supernews.com
On Jan 5, 8:21 am, Andrew Haley <andre...@littlepinkcloud.invalid>
wrote:
> Given that the article even manages to confuse Polish notation and
> Reverse Polish notation, I strongly recommend that everyone avoid it.
Hi man,
if you are not familiar with RPN, please see:
http://xahlee.org/prog/hp28s/hp28s.html
there are several free progs writting in RPN language. Among which, is
a music chord generating prog, could be fun to play with.
if you in college, you could show it to your friends and be
impressive.
Also, you might want to pickup emacs. In it, you can type 【Alt+x】,
Enter, then type “calc”, then you can play with RPN. My own pet peeve
about emacs calc is about its doc... due to that, i never actually
done much with it in the past decade of emacs-using other than simple
arithemitcs with Reals. Though, am aware of the fact that it can very
much do vector and matrix — even solving equations — arithemitcs, as
well as complex.
Xah
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-01-07 5:36 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 84+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-01-01 7:04 How to improve the readability of (any) LISP or any highlevel functional language to the level of FORTH ? girosenth
2011-01-01 11:39 ` Elena
2011-01-01 14:15 ` Pascal J. Bourguignon
2011-01-01 16:08 ` Nathan
2011-01-01 18:05 ` Jan Burse
2011-01-01 23:56 ` The Quiet Center
2011-01-02 1:10 ` Jan Burse
2011-01-02 3:45 ` LanX
2011-01-02 4:04 ` LanX
2011-01-02 5:36 ` Nathan
2011-01-02 6:46 ` Paul Rubin
2011-01-02 15:01 ` LanX
2011-01-02 15:14 ` Jerome Baum
2011-01-02 21:21 ` Paul Rubin
2011-01-02 7:14 ` w_a_x_man
2011-01-02 6:59 ` w_a_x_man
2011-01-03 15:22 ` LanX
2011-01-02 14:07 ` Frank GOENNINGER
2011-01-07 9:41 ` w_a_x_man
2011-01-09 10:41 ` How to improve the readability of (any) LISP or any highlevelfunctional " WJ
2011-01-03 10:29 ` How to improve the readability of (any) LISP or any highlevel functional " Didier Verna
2011-01-03 13:05 ` Tim Harig
2011-01-04 4:49 ` rusi
2011-01-04 5:39 ` D Herring
2011-01-04 8:02 ` Tim Harig
2011-01-04 9:09 ` Nicolas Neuss
2011-01-04 10:00 ` Tim Bradshaw
2011-01-04 12:21 ` Tim Harig
2011-01-04 12:23 ` Tim Bradshaw
2011-01-04 13:33 ` Tim Harig
2011-01-04 12:41 ` Tamas K Papp
2011-01-04 23:32 ` Tim X
2011-01-05 1:35 ` [OT] LISP community advocacy [was Re: How to improve the readability of (any) LISP or any highlevel functional language to the level of FORTH ?] Tim Harig
2011-01-05 9:52 ` How to improve the readability of (any) LISP or any highlevel functional language to the level of FORTH ? Tim Bradshaw
2011-01-04 6:24 ` Pascal J. Bourguignon
2011-01-04 15:43 ` Raffael Cavallaro
2011-01-04 10:18 ` Didier Verna
2011-01-01 22:50 ` girosenth
2011-01-02 21:11 ` Thien-Thi Nguyen
2011-01-03 16:21 ` José A. Romero L.
2011-01-03 18:03 ` jacko
2011-01-02 23:45 ` Chip Eastham
2011-01-01 18:27 ` How to improve the readability of Steve Revilak
2011-01-01 19:22 ` How to improve the readability of (any) LISP or any highlevel functional language to the level of FORTH ? prad
2011-01-01 23:56 ` Pascal Costanza
2011-01-02 5:39 ` D Herring
2011-01-02 14:17 ` Frank GOENNINGER
2011-01-02 14:53 ` Jerome Baum
2011-01-02 14:58 ` LanX
2011-01-02 17:55 ` Bernd Paysan
2011-01-03 18:07 ` jacko
2011-01-02 12:59 ` Doug Hoffman
2011-01-02 19:14 ` w_a_x_man
2011-01-03 5:20 ` Elizabeth D Rather
2011-01-03 10:48 ` MarkWills
2011-01-03 15:13 ` LanX
2011-01-03 18:20 ` jacko
2011-01-03 18:22 ` jacko
2011-01-03 10:18 ` Didier Verna
2011-01-04 6:47 ` pineapple
2011-01-04 14:14 ` P.M.Lawrence
2011-01-05 14:58 ` Xah Lee
2011-01-05 16:21 ` Andrew Haley
2011-01-05 21:29 ` Pascal J. Bourguignon
2011-01-06 8:57 ` Jonathan Groll
2011-01-07 5:36 ` Xah Lee [this message]
2011-01-07 13:28 ` Andrew Haley
2011-01-07 16:19 ` Xah Lee
2011-01-05 17:59 ` Elena
2011-01-05 20:13 ` Xah Lee
2011-01-05 21:42 ` Pascal J. Bourguignon
2011-01-06 13:38 ` Doug Hoffman
2011-01-06 19:20 ` Pascal J. Bourguignon
2011-01-07 0:09 ` w_a_x_man
2011-01-07 12:04 ` Doug Hoffman
2011-01-06 22:59 ` Xah Lee
2011-01-07 11:47 ` Jan Burse
2011-01-21 10:03 ` rupertlssmith
2011-01-21 16:08 ` Jan Burse
2011-01-21 21:43 ` D. J. Penton
2011-01-18 22:55 ` m_l_g3
2011-01-19 13:45 ` Doug Hoffman
2011-01-21 16:15 ` Jan Burse
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2011-01-02 16:50 Drew Adams
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
List information: https://www.gnu.org/software/emacs/
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=519ccda4-c690-40f8-b59d-662b292e5bd2@o23g2000prh.googlegroups.com \
--to=xahlee@gmail.com \
--cc=help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).