From: "Andreas Röhler" <andreas.roehler@easy-emacs.de>
To: help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org
Subject: Re: Basic legal question: Publication of a fix to psgml
Date: Thu, 04 Apr 2013 10:38:29 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <515D3C05.2070501@easy-emacs.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <kjhnfd0odc@news4.newsguy.com>
Am 03.04.2013 19:04, schrieb B. T. Raven:
> Die Wed Apr 03 2013 07:03:40 GMT-0500 (Central Daylight Time) Andreas
> Röhler <andreas.roehler@easy-emacs.de> scripsit:
>
>> Am 03.04.2013 10:29, schrieb Bastien:
>>> Hi Andreas,
>>>
>>> Andreas Röhler <andreas.roehler@easy-emacs.de> writes:
>>>
>>>> CA, as we learned, is partly privately negotiated.
>>>
>>> Not to my knowledge.
>>>
>>
>> http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-devel/2013-04/msg00066.html
>>
>> BTW experienced that proceeding already years ago, which is just polite
>> and correct as such.
>>
>>> The copyright assignment is signed by contributors. I'm not aware of
>>> any negociations, and I'd be surprised to learn that there are private
>>> negociations.
>>>
>>>> To evaluate the legal state of different parts in Emacs wrt CA will
>>>> need one or more lawyers.
>>>
>>> This suggests that the copyright status of Emacs is uncertain.
>>
>> Law and legal stats differ in theory and reality.
>> In theory more laws define more cases and should provide more security.
>> In reality the realm of possible interpretation is expanded too.
>>
>>>
>>> I hope you understand it is quite a serious statement and requires
>>> some evidence.
>>>
>>> The copyright status for code in Org's code is very clear, and I think
>>> this is also the case for the copyright status of the rest of Emacs.
>>> I sometimes get impatient when I have to wait for the FSF Copyright
>>> Clerk to handle new copyright assignments for a new contributor, but
>>> I know he has a lot of work and he's doing a great job.
>>>
>>
>> To know the copyright status as such --as assignments may differ-- you
>> must read assignment by assignment, evaluate and understand the diffs
>> correctly -
>> which is absurd as IMHO the whole CA arts.
>>
>> BTW German law --Urheberrechtsgesetz-- for example declares non-valid
>> such copyright assignments - even if signed.
>> Will a US-court accept CA from a German, when german law declares CA
>> possible?
>
> Your English is so good that I can't tell whether you are a native
> speaker or not.
Thanks! FWIW ;)
Did you mean to write "if (wenn) German law declares CA
> IMpossible"?
yep, sorry, a typo.
> I'm sure the FSF's lawyers know about the status of German
> law, don't they?
Don't know. It was just an example. What about japanese or chinese law when negotiating with it citizens?
Just wanted to point at the costs and risks when entering that procedure.
> In any case, donative assignments are so legally thorny
> that any discussion of them should probably be limited to private
> communication with RMS or between/among the FSF's lawyers in camera.
>
AS the GPL works, making a success story of free software, assignment-stubborness has a kind of tragic-comic.
Not being surprised that nastiness of legal stuff corresponds with a respective style of communication:
http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-gnu-emacs/2013-03/msg00495.html
Anyway, as always in error too :)
Andreas
[ ... ]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-04-04 8:38 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-03-31 11:49 Basic legal question: Publication of a fix to psgml Florian v. Savigny
2013-03-31 13:27 ` Dmitry Gutov
2013-03-31 14:53 ` Andreas Röhler
2013-03-31 15:09 ` Bastien
2013-03-31 15:33 ` Bastien
2013-03-31 15:36 ` Andreas Röhler
2013-03-31 15:46 ` Bastien
2013-03-31 15:35 ` Andreas Röhler
2013-03-31 16:06 ` Eli Zaretskii
2013-03-31 16:57 ` Andreas Röhler
2013-03-31 18:57 ` Eli Zaretskii
2013-03-31 19:49 ` Andreas Röhler
2013-03-31 20:01 ` Eli Zaretskii
2013-03-31 21:56 ` Florian v. Savigny
2013-04-01 16:08 ` Bastien
2013-04-01 17:24 ` Florian v. Savigny
[not found] ` <mailman.23150.1364742598.855.help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org>
2013-04-02 8:54 ` Nicolas Neuss
2013-04-03 7:54 ` Andreas Röhler
2013-04-03 8:02 ` Dmitry Gutov
2013-04-03 8:16 ` Andreas Röhler
2013-04-03 8:29 ` Bastien
2013-04-03 12:03 ` Andreas Röhler
[not found] ` <mailman.23376.1364990549.855.help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org>
2013-04-03 17:04 ` B. T. Raven
2013-04-04 8:38 ` Andreas Röhler [this message]
2013-04-03 10:02 ` Phillip Lord
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
List information: https://www.gnu.org/software/emacs/
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=515D3C05.2070501@easy-emacs.de \
--to=andreas.roehler@easy-emacs.de \
--cc=help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).