Re: LaTeX-mode menu

Re: LaTeX-mode menu

[Yehudah Rubinsky]

Reiner Steib wrote

 >I guess AUCTeX *is* your "super LaTeX-mode". See the instructions in
 >the manual (info "(auctex)Top") on how to set it up.

That's what I thought as well. My .emacs contains the following.
         ;; load Auc Tex
          (require 'tex-site)
          (setq TeX-auto-save t)
          (setq TeX-parse-self t)
          (setq-default TeX-master nil)

site-lips/tex-site.el contains the following.
         (defvar TeX-lisp-directory "c:/progra~1/emacs/site-lisp/auctex/"
           "*The directory where the AUC TeX lisp files are located.")

         ;;; Autoloads:

         (add-to-list 'load-path TeX-lisp-directory)


The beginning of my load-path variable is 
("c:/progra~1/emacs/site-lisp/auctex/" nil.

The following is in the *messages* buffer when loading, even without any 
".tex" files.
         eval-buffer: Symbol's value as variable is void: latex-mode-hook

So the question still is what am I doing that prevents auctex from loading 
for LaTeX files?

Best,
Ed

Re: LaTeX-mode menu

[Yehudah Rubinsky]

 >Can it be that the value of the %HOME% environment variable in the dos
 >window differs from the value of the $HOME environment variable in the
 >cygwin bash window? If so, then you have two separate .emacs files with
 >different entries.
Actually it turned out to be runemacs.exe. If I start emacs from the DOS 
window with "start emacs --load=.emacs" instead of "runemacs --load=.emacs" 
I get auctex instead of Tex mode. (The loaded .emacs in turn loads the site 
wide .emacs.)

Best, Ed

Re: LaTeX-mode menu

[Arjan Bos]

Yehudah Rubinsky wrote:
> Think I found the difference. If I load emacs from a DOS window, tex is 
> the major mode for .tex files. If I load it from a Cygwin bash window, 
> auctex is the major mode. I'm not sure but, now that I know, I'm not 
> sure I care *8=>).
> 
> Best,
> Ed
> 
Can it be that the value of the %HOME% environment variable in the dos 
window differs from the value of the $HOME environment variable in the 
cygwin bash window? If so, then you have two separate .emacs files with 
different entries.

HTH,

Arjan


-- 
--
If you really want to contact me, then replace the "I see you" text by 
its three letter accronym, ICU.

Fabricate Diem PVNC, Motto of the Night Watch -- Terry Pratchett

Re: LaTeX-mode menu

[Yehudah Rubinsky]

Think I found the difference. If I load emacs from a DOS window, tex is the 
major mode for .tex files. If I load it from a Cygwin bash window, auctex 
is the major mode. I'm not sure but, now that I know, I'm not sure I care 
*8=>).

Best,
Ed

Re: LaTeX-mode menu

[Reiner Steib]

On Tue, Nov 18 2003, Yehudah Rubinsky wrote:

> I've been unable to figure out what causes this "super
> LaTeX-mode". Does anyone have any ideas?
>
> emacs 21.2.1 on W2K Pro / Cygwin with auctex version 11.13.
                                        ^^^^^^

I guess AUCTeX *is* your "super LaTeX-mode".  See the instructions in
the manual (info "(auctex)Top") on how to set it up.

Bye, Reiner.
-- 
       ,,,
      (o o)
---ooO-(_)-Ooo--- PGP key available via WWW   http://rsteib.home.pages.de/

LaTeX-mode menu

[Yehudah Rubinsky]

I have noticed that when editing in LaTeX mode I sometimes get a "super 
LaTeX-mode". This mode has LaTeX  and Command menus and lots of additional 
keystroke commands (i.e. C-c C-f C-font) while the normal LaTeX mode has 
only a TeX menu. I've been unable to figure out what causes this "super 
LaTeX-mode". Does anyone have any ideas?

emacs 21.2.1 on W2K Pro / Cygwin with auctex version 11.13.

Best,
Ed