From: Ted Zlatanov <tzz@lifelogs.com>
Subject: Re: w3 under development or not?
Date: Fri, 14 Nov 2003 13:43:44 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4nekwa3i5b.fsf@lockgroove.bwh.harvard.edu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: u3ccqzw5b.fsf@swbell.net
On Fri, 14 Nov 2003, pete_lee@swbell.net wrote:
>>>>> Ted Zlatanov writes:
>
> Ted> This is a really dangerous recommendation. If you just
> Ted> want to eliminate executable attachments, which you seem to
> Ted> be trying to do, use something like this Procmail recipe:
>
> Ted> or install a program designed for that purpose,
> Ted> e.g. SpamAssassin.
>
> Are those tools able to delete on the server? If so, and they work
> on windows, and are fairly simple to set up, I'll have a look.
There are many, many such tools. For Unix mail servers the options
are plentiful and a simple web search will turn them up. I don't use
Windows mail servers but I'm sure similar tools exist for them.
> Ted> are you sure you will never want to find out about security
> Ted> packages, or receive mail from people at Microsoft?
>
> On this particular account, I'm positive.
I think that's pretty dangerous, but it's certainly your prerogative
to block mail from anyone. Recommending that to a newsgroup,
however, merits a little more explanation :) Generally, solutions
that are manually maintained tend to fall behind the spam - you're
trying to block yesterday's spam. It may work, but it's a lot of
effort.
Ted
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2003-11-14 18:43 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <mailman.124.1068506807.2005.help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org>
2003-11-11 17:16 ` w3 under development or not? Björn Lindström
2003-11-11 22:50 ` Stefan Monnier
[not found] ` <bosoof$hru$1@news1.wdf.sap-ag.de>
2003-11-12 10:21 ` A. L. Meyers
2003-11-12 13:59 ` Stefan Monnier
2003-11-13 15:10 ` Friedrich Dominicus
2003-11-14 8:12 ` Shane
2003-11-14 9:19 ` Poppong mail (Re: w3 under development or not?) Gian Uberto Lauri
2003-11-14 10:23 ` OT spamfilter A. L. Meyers
2003-11-14 18:22 ` Harry Putnam
2003-11-14 20:07 ` A. L. Meyers
2003-11-14 19:01 ` Tim McNamara
2003-11-14 15:30 ` w3 under development or not? Peter Lee
2003-11-14 16:09 ` Ted Zlatanov
2003-11-14 17:40 ` Peter Lee
2003-11-14 18:43 ` Ted Zlatanov [this message]
2003-11-14 22:39 ` Peter Lee
2003-11-15 4:34 ` Juri Linkov
2003-11-15 13:31 ` Ted Zlatanov
2003-11-17 15:44 ` Alan Mackenzie
2003-11-14 18:21 ` Harry Putnam
2003-11-14 16:01 ` Gnus attachment downloading blocks other Emacs interaction (was: w3 under development or not?) Ted Zlatanov
2003-11-12 21:07 w3 under development or not? Joe Corneli
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2003-11-10 21:59 Joe Corneli
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
List information: https://www.gnu.org/software/emacs/
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4nekwa3i5b.fsf@lockgroove.bwh.harvard.edu \
--to=tzz@lifelogs.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).