From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Drew Adams Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.help Subject: RE: Temporary notes in Emacs buffers? Date: Sat, 11 Jan 2020 18:47:34 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <4d497ee1-44fe-460d-af49-8c973dc43677@default> References: <87zhfecbpt.fsf@mbork.pl> <87sgl0osts.fsf@web.de> <65742f83-393a-4df2-9562-7c500b40adcd@default> <87a777ydnh.fsf@web.de> <73dc0d0e-f208-4169-a70d-f2f17994a4f4@default> <87sgkmla13.fsf@web.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Injection-Info: blaine.gmane.org; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:195.159.176.226"; logging-data="202206"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@blaine.gmane.org" Cc: Michael Heerdegen , Help Gnu Emacs mailing list To: John Yates Original-X-From: help-gnu-emacs-bounces+geh-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Sun Jan 12 03:49:06 2020 Return-path: Envelope-to: geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1iqTIS-000Zfb-7A for geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Sun, 12 Jan 2020 03:48:12 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:34668 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1iqTIQ-00030V-Jj for geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Sat, 11 Jan 2020 21:48:10 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:54371) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1iqTI6-00030N-Dc for help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 11 Jan 2020 21:47:51 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1iqTI4-0003kV-U6 for help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 11 Jan 2020 21:47:49 -0500 Original-Received: from userp2130.oracle.com ([156.151.31.86]:35238) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1iqTI4-0003Z7-JG for help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 11 Jan 2020 21:47:48 -0500 Original-Received: from pps.filterd (userp2130.oracle.com [127.0.0.1]) by userp2130.oracle.com (8.16.0.27/8.16.0.27) with SMTP id 00C2hCTo158066; Sun, 12 Jan 2020 02:47:44 GMT DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=oracle.com; h=mime-version : message-id : date : from : sender : to : cc : subject : references : in-reply-to : content-type : content-transfer-encoding; s=corp-2019-08-05; bh=+B/0Mj6R/HX6+1mE9jZzW0r4OY3oYALHNRZ+VC5ExHg=; b=k9YXDtZaUu2TMkIOumGvL0cvpZWUa5QR5+vMrL22jrqdvvPvx8DcgcC5b6yj04NrSwId sLB6uyF1VWq32eUTowUvj0k6SFpF3CUNXyily8Lu+h5R11JQE6+CQrCzIPwSP3OHmlSe Qa0sSkKBX+HDqI4FyT0rmNg+AzoFwQoYuN4SxQBH/4Iku91EM7/JcsnLtzX0PsqfVege oeMMxRMABWu3UWfBMZ3lIwAlxIfza4yidyik9wptDeVItoDA1L0QROp+bfVAjGhmoIpa hvUtBHKSyld8I0cltn8XQP4Zm19OxOJI/05DcTlrrlGZMQkNGaUI7UHwKrEMEVFeOjlM sA== Original-Received: from userp3030.oracle.com (userp3030.oracle.com [156.151.31.80]) by userp2130.oracle.com with ESMTP id 2xf74rt6u6-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=OK); Sun, 12 Jan 2020 02:47:44 +0000 Original-Received: from pps.filterd (userp3030.oracle.com [127.0.0.1]) by userp3030.oracle.com (8.16.0.27/8.16.0.27) with SMTP id 00C2iJ9I179274; Sun, 12 Jan 2020 02:47:43 GMT Original-Received: from userv0121.oracle.com (userv0121.oracle.com [156.151.31.72]) by userp3030.oracle.com with ESMTP id 2xfqu26hww-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=OK); Sun, 12 Jan 2020 02:47:43 +0000 Original-Received: from abhmp0020.oracle.com (abhmp0020.oracle.com [141.146.116.26]) by userv0121.oracle.com (8.14.4/8.13.8) with ESMTP id 00C2lZZj021686; Sun, 12 Jan 2020 02:47:37 GMT In-Reply-To: X-Priority: 3 X-Mailer: Oracle Beehive Extensions for Outlook 2.0.1.9.1 (1003210) [OL 16.0.4939.0 (x86)] X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=nai engine=6000 definitions=9497 signatures=668685 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=notspam policy=default score=0 suspectscore=0 malwarescore=0 phishscore=0 bulkscore=0 spamscore=0 mlxscore=0 mlxlogscore=877 adultscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.0.1-1911140001 definitions=main-2001120024 X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=nai engine=6000 definitions=9497 signatures=668685 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=notspam policy=default score=0 priorityscore=1501 malwarescore=0 suspectscore=0 phishscore=0 bulkscore=0 spamscore=0 clxscore=1015 lowpriorityscore=0 mlxscore=0 impostorscore=0 mlxlogscore=937 adultscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.0.1-1911140001 definitions=main-2001120024 X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 3.x [generic] [fuzzy] X-Received-From: 156.151.31.86 X-BeenThere: help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: Users list for the GNU Emacs text editor List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: help-gnu-emacs-bounces+geh-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "help-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.help:122208 Archived-At: > My read is that bookmarks share the same > deficiency as tag tables. That is once > loaded it is the user's responsibility > to manage. Dunno what that means. Could you elaborate? Like bookmark files, you can have any number of tag tables. And like bookmark files, you you can switch among tag files whenever you want. So yes, there are such similarities. And? That just means users can control their use. How is such control a "deficiency" or a "management responsibility"? And "once loaded" seems irrelevant. What management is forced on you by loading a tag file or a bookmark file? The same is true of any file you load, whether a file of customizations, function definitions, key bindings, synonyms, or anything else: once loaded, you can use the file content. Likewise, a mode. Once turned on, you can use its features, key bindings, etc. And you can turn it off or switch to another mode anytime. Likewise, a flash drive: Once inserted, you can use its files. And you can switch to a different drive anytime. Etc. What "deficiencies" are we talking about here?