From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: uzibalqa Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.help Subject: Re: Remove auctex from emacs Date: Mon, 12 Sep 2022 13:18:20 +0000 Message-ID: <4JPfgfaJhGMNu0GVKlbgdOaYJmX8Cih8WZ6iYJkX-3JCK8QGot58RCyu8yWxajlfxWmXdRuWDy01mv6LkV9TY-Ms4RS_I6-ZvMjJta4_Ss8=@proton.me> References: <878rmp6p1a.fsf@mbork.pl> <874jxc7pok.fsf@mbork.pl> Reply-To: uzibalqa Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="18245"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: uzibalqa via Users list for the GNU Emacs text editor To: Marcin Borkowski Original-X-From: help-gnu-emacs-bounces+geh-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Mon Sep 12 15:21:23 2022 Return-path: Envelope-to: geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1oXjNL-0004ZK-47 for geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Mon, 12 Sep 2022 15:21:23 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:35274 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1oXjNK-0001FV-4w for geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Mon, 12 Sep 2022 09:21:22 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:43624) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1oXjKg-00018D-1S for help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 12 Sep 2022 09:18:38 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-40138.protonmail.ch ([185.70.40.138]:22489) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1oXjKd-0006TU-3D for help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 12 Sep 2022 09:18:37 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=proton.me; s=protonmail; t=1662988711; x=1663247911; bh=vLia44ChnB9h9U1+UDAwmzxH9tO8CexqEUq4XJGo/Ps=; h=Date:To:From:Cc:Reply-To:Subject:Message-ID:In-Reply-To: References:Feedback-ID:From:To:Cc:Date:Subject:Reply-To: Feedback-ID:Message-ID; b=g7HkUUYN5niiD1FfaLvcT9s1e3yHOkUdETM59A/4O4+dTrwFcIsyQ6ugxgz/u3/uJ pq7czFWtePRvVSGckrl01kAKG95rwlpKUBUh9ch4C6toTPP9Q92qTB3zPvqyXDEUnj j3r16Kg2yS8h4peI82xn+5MhEntRyiq9yZG8q32TVwNbcgfU7/h6R3Myo8uRvol1h5 B2r3DvESOQMWKQ7rVRX54U4/E7hExGvuJS6X/Yo7i+vzYuxKpFIxTpW0gyfw+b1PE7 jjFy5/qLeaO0LiP3XSVmiW9YIfc7dJJh1Cscv6x9FPFkGD7KiNkqKNSYB9IoD3cEqr T948bkUSlYHuQ== In-Reply-To: <874jxc7pok.fsf@mbork.pl> Feedback-ID: 52887082:user:proton Received-SPF: pass client-ip=185.70.40.138; envelope-from=uzibalqa@proton.me; helo=mail-40138.protonmail.ch X-Spam_score_int: -20 X-Spam_score: -2.1 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: (-2.1 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Users list for the GNU Emacs text editor List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: help-gnu-emacs-bounces+geh-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "help-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.help:139420 Archived-At: ------- Original Message ------- On Monday, September 12th, 2022 at 12:16 PM, Marcin Borkowski wrote: > On 2022-09-12, at 12:01, uzibalqa uzibalqa@proton.me wrote: >=20 > > ------- Original Message ------- > > On Monday, September 12th, 2022 at 7:16 AM, Marcin Borkowski mbork@mbor= k.pl wrote: > >=20 > > > On 2022-09-11, at 21:19, uzibalqa uzibalqa@proton.me wrote: > > >=20 > > > > How can remove auctex from emacs so that i can use tex-mode and lat= ex-mode ? > > >=20 > > > Out of curiosity: why? Is there anything that AUCTeX doesn't do that > > > the built-in tex-mode/latex-mode does? I never used the built-in mode= , > > > but I read its documentation (many years ago), and it seems rather > > > simplistic. OTOH, I used AUCTeX for many, many years (at least 15 yea= rs > > > - now I rarely do anything in (La)TeX), and it has always served me w= ell > > > (maybe apart from rather poor ConTeXt support, idk if that improved - > > > but it still wasn't very bad). > > >=20 > > > Best, > >=20 > > Whatever it is, major-modes are not supposed to work that way. >=20 >=20 > Not sure what do you mean. Worked for me for well over a decade. > I assume it might bother you that it doesn't seem to have an entry in > `auto-mode-alist' =E2=80=93 but that makes sense given that the same file= name pattern ("\\\\.tex$") corresponds to several modes (plain TeX/LaTeX/C= onTeXt/possible others, like AMSTeX). You could argue that there should be = one major AUCTeX mode and plain TeX/LaTeX/etc. minor modes =E2=80=93 but it= is what it is, and I guess it's way too late to change that. Probably` mag= ic-mode-alist' could help =E2=80=93 but I have a hunch that it's > more recent than AUCTeX' mechanism for major mode selection. (It was > defined in Emacs 22.1 =E2=80=93 I'm 99% sure AUCTeX was around much earli= er. > I seem to vaguely recollect the first Emacs version I used to be 21 > (=C2=B11), and I almost certainly attended a presentation about AUCTeX be= fore > I even used Emacs.) =20 There are too many tex and latex packages today, making the original design= quite inadequate,=20 particularly with the emergence of cdlatex.