From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: "Lennart Borgman (gmail)" Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.help Subject: Re: Optimal emacs shell for coding Date: Tue, 12 Aug 2008 21:02:21 +0200 Message-ID: <48A1DE3D.7070704@gmail.com> References: <577bf477-6877-4cab-b4c3-fb72b995a095@i20g2000prf.googlegroups.com> <66bf7b7c-8e2b-4266-812a-6531c93f9399@v1g2000pra.googlegroups.com> <87skta4py4.fsf@lion.rapttech.com.au> <48A17CAA.2060505@gmail.com> <48A1D923.1030001@gmail.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1218567816 13640 80.91.229.12 (12 Aug 2008 19:03:36 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 12 Aug 2008 19:03:36 +0000 (UTC) Cc: help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: help-gnu-emacs-bounces+geh-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Aug 12 21:04:28 2008 Return-path: Envelope-to: geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1KSz9u-0006hX-Aa for geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Tue, 12 Aug 2008 21:03:54 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:43178 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1KSz8y-0006nI-As for geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Tue, 12 Aug 2008 15:02:56 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1KSz8a-0006ks-Qy for help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 12 Aug 2008 15:02:32 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1KSz8Z-0006jM-Dn for help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 12 Aug 2008 15:02:32 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=45917 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1KSz8Z-0006jG-7W for help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 12 Aug 2008 15:02:31 -0400 Original-Received: from ch-smtp02.sth.basefarm.net ([80.76.149.213]:41378) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1KSz8U-0007St-BO; Tue, 12 Aug 2008 15:02:26 -0400 Original-Received: from c83-254-151-176.bredband.comhem.se ([83.254.151.176]:60361 helo=[127.0.0.1]) by ch-smtp02.sth.basefarm.net with esmtp (Exim 4.68) (envelope-from ) id 1KSz8S-0007sR-7b; Tue, 12 Aug 2008 21:02:24 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.8.1.9) Gecko/20071031 Thunderbird/2.0.0.9 Mnenhy/0.7.5.666 In-Reply-To: X-Antivirus: avast! (VPS 080812-0, 2008-08-12), Outbound message X-Antivirus-Status: Clean X-Originating-IP: 83.254.151.176 X-ACL-Warn: Too high rate of unknown addresses received from you X-Scan-Result: No virus found in message 1KSz8S-0007sR-7b. X-Scan-Signature: ch-smtp02.sth.basefarm.net 1KSz8S-0007sR-7b ffa747449501df54c8bc52951106f18b X-detected-kernel: by monty-python.gnu.org: Linux 2.6? (barebone, rare!) X-BeenThere: help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Users list for the GNU Emacs text editor List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: help-gnu-emacs-bounces+geh-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: help-gnu-emacs-bounces+geh-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.help:56522 Archived-At: Eli Zaretskii wrote: >> Date: Tue, 12 Aug 2008 20:40:35 +0200 >> From: "Lennart Borgman (gmail)" >> CC: help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org >> >> Eli Zaretskii wrote: >>>> Date: Tue, 12 Aug 2008 14:06:02 +0200 >>>> From: "Lennart Borgman (gmail)" >>>> CC: help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org >>>> >>>> If you look carefully at the output you can see that what is not handled >>>> is the parameters to "ls". If you try "ls -1" it will work. >>> What "parameters to ls"? "ls" was invoked without any parameters. >> If you from a shell do >> >> ls | grep >> >> then normally ls implicitly gets the -1 parameter > > No, it doesn't. Please try and see for yourself (I just did). We are miscommunicating. Exactly what are you saying? I am saying that if I from a shell outside of Emacs do ls than I get several files listed on each row while the output from ls | grep some-file implies that ls got the implicit argument -1 when used in the pipe.