From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: "Lennart Borgman (gmail)" Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.help Subject: Re: LISP routines for commenting Date: Sat, 09 Aug 2008 19:11:26 +0200 Message-ID: <489DCFBE.3000807@gmail.com> References: <87proi6tdp.fsf@tux.homenetwork> <489DC909.2080603@gmail.com> <87ljz66ry2.fsf@tux.homenetwork> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1218301926 20792 80.91.229.12 (9 Aug 2008 17:12:06 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 9 Aug 2008 17:12:06 +0000 (UTC) Cc: help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org, weber To: Thierry Volpiatto Original-X-From: help-gnu-emacs-bounces+geh-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Aug 09 19:12:57 2008 Return-path: Envelope-to: geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1KRrzr-0002HI-P8 for geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sat, 09 Aug 2008 19:12:56 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:58173 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1KRryv-000531-Td for geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sat, 09 Aug 2008 13:11:57 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1KRryY-00051f-TM for help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 09 Aug 2008 13:11:34 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1KRryW-0004yS-G6 for help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 09 Aug 2008 13:11:33 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=35438 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1KRryW-0004yC-Am for help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 09 Aug 2008 13:11:32 -0400 Original-Received: from ch-smtp01.sth.basefarm.net ([80.76.149.212]:41797) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1KRryV-0002bP-QX for help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 09 Aug 2008 13:11:32 -0400 Original-Received: from c83-254-151-176.bredband.comhem.se ([83.254.151.176]:63047 helo=[127.0.0.1]) by ch-smtp01.sth.basefarm.net with esmtp (Exim 4.68) (envelope-from ) id 1KRryT-00076U-6R; Sat, 09 Aug 2008 19:11:30 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.8.1.9) Gecko/20071031 Thunderbird/2.0.0.9 Mnenhy/0.7.5.666 In-Reply-To: <87ljz66ry2.fsf@tux.homenetwork> X-Antivirus: avast! (VPS 080808-0, 2008-08-08), Outbound message X-Antivirus-Status: Clean X-Originating-IP: 83.254.151.176 X-Scan-Result: No virus found in message 1KRryT-00076U-6R. X-Scan-Signature: ch-smtp01.sth.basefarm.net 1KRryT-00076U-6R a612dad2cfb4da4ca5d5e85f8327b15a X-detected-kernel: by monty-python.gnu.org: Linux 2.6? (barebone, rare!) X-BeenThere: help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Users list for the GNU Emacs text editor List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: help-gnu-emacs-bounces+geh-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: help-gnu-emacs-bounces+geh-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.help:56368 Archived-At: Thierry Volpiatto wrote: > "Lennart Borgman (gmail)" writes: > >> Thierry Volpiatto wrote: >>> Python-mode provide a command for indenting that is bind to: >>> >>> C-c # ==> comment >>> C-u C-c # ==> uncomment >>> The command is: `py-comment-region' >>> >>> It is better to comment with that instead of the usual M-; >>> because it don't affect indentation after a block of commented code. >> >> Do you mean that this is a bug in the support for M-; in phyton-mode? >> Or is it a bug in M-; >> > I don't think it's a bug, it's just better to comment with the proper > function in python, especially if there is complex level of indentation > (loop followed with other loop and if if if...etc). But isn't there a bug somewhere if M-; does not do the right thing? > However M-; work in most cases. > So if it's a bug, it come from python-mode, because M-; normally have to > be used with python.el (is it working with python.el ?) because it is > the normal mode to use in emacs with python even if IMHO python-mode is > much better. >